Bring Them In

As I have reported over the past several weeks, Big Tech monopolies are interfering in the 2020 election on behalf of Joe Biden and the Democratic Party. Their involvement, some rightly argue, is straight-up electioneering and could constitute egregious campaign finance violations since corporations are prohibited from directly donating to political candidates. By banning Republican content while amplifying Democratic Party messaging this close to a national election, Big Tech in essence is contributing potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in free advertisements (in-kind contributions) to Democratic candidates, including their nominee for president. “Twitter, and Facebook…they’re like really, it’s a massive campaign contribution,” President Trump said on Fox Business News Thursday morning.

Their involvement will extend past Election Day and into January 2021 if the results are still unknown. In the interim, Silicon Valley oligarchs plan to crush any online dissent, including by the president of the United States, if a message runs afoul of plans to install Joe Biden in the White House. Even if Trump legitimately wins reelection, any premature declaration of victory will be suppressed or outright removed from social media and Internet search engines.

Whatever attempt there may have been to conceal this orchestrated operation, however, was blown wide open Wednesday after the New York Post published explosive emails and photos retrieved from Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop computer. Communications appear to confirm that Joe Biden met with an executive of Burisma and his son in 2015 despite Biden’s repeated denials. 

Further, another email apparently shows that the Obama White House and a Democratic-tied public relations firm, also retained by Burisma, held a call to discuss Biden’s trip to Ukraine in December 2015, the same trip during which the vice president threatened to withhold a U.S. loan guarantee until a Ukrainian prosecutor looking into Burisma’s criminality was fired. (Victor Shokin was fired a few months later.)

The timing of the bombshell reports—Rudy Guiliani, the source behind the release of the information recovered from the hard drive said to be Hunter Biden’s, promises more to come in the days ahead—rocked the political world. 

Biden announced a “lid” on campaign activities immediately after the articles went viral. His campaign spokesman said the alleged 2015 meeting between Hunter, his pop, and the Burisma executive did not appear on Biden’s “official schedule,” but an advisor told Politico later in the day that they could not rule out the possibility that Biden “had some kind of informal interaction with [Burisma’s Vadym] Pozharskyi, which wouldn’t appear on Biden’s official schedule. But they said any encounter would have been cursory.”

Any confirmation that Biden met with a Burisma executive, either formally or informally, would expose Biden’s past denials as a lie, a potentially campaign-ending revelation with less than three weeks until Election Day.

While Biden’s lackeys in the media attempted to discredit the Post’s coverage as part of a “Russian disinformation campaign” against the Democratic nominee, Twitter and Facebook swooped in to save the day. Twitter blocked users from sharing the article; a warning attached to the article claimed the Post’s website was “unsafe.” Accounts belonging to White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany, the House Judiciary Committee, and Trump’s campaign team were censored. As of Thursday afternoon, the Post’s Twitter feed remained locked. (In September, Twitter’s public policy director left the company to join the Biden transition team.)

Facebook also announced it would reduce the story’s accessibility pending a “fact-check” review of the materials. Andy Stone, the Facebook spokesman who posted the alert on Twitter, is a former Democratic staffer.

The censorship quickly caught the attention of Senate Republicans. In a tweet Wednesday evening, Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said the actions by Facebook and Twitter “are potential violations of election law, and that’s a crime.” 

The first-term senator, a Big Tech hawk who has pushed for the repeal of the FCC’s Section 230 protections for social media platforms, also sent a letter to the Federal Election Commission on October 14. It read in part: 

Federal law prohibits any corporation from making a contribution to a federal candidate for office. 52 U.S.C. § 30118(a). Twitter and Facebook are both corporations. A ‘contribution’ includes ‘anything of value . . . for the purpose of influencing any election for Federal office.’ 52 U.S.C. § 30101(8)(A)(i). Twitter’s and Facebook’s active suppression of public speech about the New York Post article appears to constitute contributions under federal law. There can be no serious doubt that the Biden campaign derives extraordinary value from depriving voters access to information that, if true, would link the former vice president to corrupt Ukrainian oligarchs.

Hawley’s letter, unfortunately, will go nowhere fast. The FEC is short a commissioner and cannot call a quorum; three of the agency’s six seats are vacant. Further, Democratic appointee and Trump troll Ellen Weintraub remains at the FEC years after her term expired. Even if the agency could conduct business, it’s unlikely that any action would be taken this year.

With the clock winding down and millions of Americans already voting, Senate Republicans announced Thursday they plan to subpoena Twitter’s Jack Dorsey and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg. The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote Tuesday to compel testimony from both tech titans next Friday. 

“The attempt to rig an election, which is what we’re seeing here, by monopolies is unprecedented in American history,” Hawley told reporters October 15 during a break from Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing.

Senators shouldn’t waste too much time grilling the pair about censorship—which isn’t against the law—or even whining about Section 230 breeches, which most Americans don’t understand. A better plan would be to ask Dorsey and Zuckerberg to monetize their de facto contributions to Joe Biden and the Democrats. After all, the platforms also are censoring content critical of mail-in voting at the same time reports of mail-in voting fraud are rampant.

Senators should also press Dorsey and Zuckerberg about their post-election plans. Facebook will prohibit any candidate, including the president, from declaring victory until the results are certified; that rule aligns with Democrats’ plan to extend Election Day until “every vote is counted.” The delay could last several weeks. Twitter undoubtedly will follow Facebook’s lead.

Most Americans are unaware of Big Tech’s unscrupulous and potentially unlawful involvement in the 2020 presidential election. A public congressional hearing will alert Americans about what these powerful monopolies are up to plus what’s in store after Election Day.

And Twitter and Facebook won’t be able to ban it.

About Julie Kelly

Julie Kelly is a political commentator and senior contributor to American Greatness. She is the author of Disloyal Opposition: How the NeverTrump Right Tried―And Failed―To Take Down the President Her past work can be found at The Federalist and National Review. She also has been featured in the Wall Street Journal, The Hill, Chicago Tribune, Forbes, and Genetic Literacy Project. After college graduation, she served as a policy and communications consultant for several Republican candidates and elected officials in suburban Chicago. She also volunteered for her local GOP organization. After staying home for more than 10 years to raise her two daughters, Julie began teaching cooking classes out of her home. She then started writing about food policy, agriculture, and biotechnology, as well as climate change and other scientific issues. She graduated from Eastern Illinois University in 1990 with a degree in communications and minor degrees in political science and journalism. Julie lives in suburban Chicago with her husband, two daughters, and (unfortunately) three dogs.

Photo: Hindustan Times/Getty Images

Content created by the Center for American Greatness, Inc. is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a significant audience. For licensing opportunities for our original content, please contact licensing@centerforamericangreatness.com.

Want news updates?

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

13 responses to “Bring Them In

  • A show trial by republicans is all well and good, but until the laws change (230) and people are prosecuted nothing will change.

    So the legislators have to legislate and the DOJ has to prosecute. Both have showed their lack of enthusiasm for doing the basic job.

    If Biden wins expect Big Tech to completely censor any conservative thoughts and writings. With this the country slides closer to the socialist dems dream of one party tyrannical rule in the US.

  • Test – fourth message I post, none appeared. AG, this comment system is seriously faulty.

    Test

  • We need actual heads on actual spears. Take the top 500 people at Twitter, cut their heads off and stuff them on spikes.

  • I think pointing out how all the executives donate to Democrats only, and are actively transitioning to potential jobs in the next administration should be pointed out.

  • I believe that Facebook, Instagram and Twitter vastly over-estimate their actual political influences, and maybe Congress takes them at their word. There are more than 100 other websites and online services which do the same things they do – often much better, because many provide confidentiality and evidence against message-tampering. I would be delighted for President Trump to demonstrate the power that -he- has by switching to a more friendly competing service: many millions of subscribers (and their advertising revenue) would instantly switch to that service, never to return.

  • It doesn’t matter. Nothing will happen to them unless Trump is re-elected. It’s a joke unless that happens. And even then who knows? Good luck getting any action.

  • Facebook and Twitter employees donate heavily (90%) to Democrats. More than half of them are on work visas. The question is, are they allowed to donate to political parties?

  • ‘Bring Them In’ for what, a Senate showboat hearing, everyone witnessed Big Tech’s latest stunt, pulled all of the Section 230, if you think you can get the votes to accomplish that, I doubt it or we wouldn’t have a Section 230 protections, curtsey of Big Tech’s lobbyists..

  • In our divided government can anybody pull m together a majority to modify or eliminate Section 230?

  • Nothing will happen because the GOP is a joke. Weintraub should be in prison. Why isn’t the FEC staffed? Who the hell is sitting on their hands? The entire federal bureaucracy must be gutted to have any chance at returning the government to legitimacy

  • The New York Post needs to publish their story and provide the link to all Americans. Maybe the Wall Street Journal would publish the website. Americans need to see that story and be able to make an informed decision about their next president.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *