TEXT JOIN TO 77022

Californians Vote to Spend $6.4B on Homelessness Despite Crushing Debt

Over two weeks after Super Tuesday, a race in California has been called regarding a statewide ballot initiative to spend billions of the state’s dollars on the worsening homeless crisis, despite the state government facing enormous debt.

According to Fox News, California’s Proposition 1 was approved by voters statewide with an extremely narrow margin; with 7.2 million votes cast, the measure passed with just 50.2% in favor and 49.80% opposed, a difference of just under 29,000 votes.

Proposition 1 orders county governments to spend money on housing and drug treatment for the homeless population, with the measure allowing the state to raise a $6.4 billion bond in order to fund the program. The state government is currently facing a budget debt of $73 billion.

The proposition was championed by Governor Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.), who celebrated its passing in a statement.

“This is the biggest change in decades in how California tackles homelessness and a victory for doing things radically different,” said Newsom after the result was announced. “Now, counties and local officials must match the ambition of California voters. This historic reform will only succeed if we all kick into action immediately – state government and local leaders, together.”

The $6.38 billion total will go towards building 4,350 new housing units and 6,800 beds for use in mental health and addiction treatment. The law mandates that counties spend at least two-thirds of funds that were raised from a 2004 wealth tax on this particular issue, including mental health services, housing, and programs for the homeless. The wealth tax currently raises between $2 billion and $3 billion on an annual basis.

Governor Newsom has already spent over $22 billion on the homeless crisis in recent years, including a $3.5 billion program to convert motels into homeless shelters. Yet despite the spending, California’s homeless population has increased dramatically, currently standing at roughly 181,000.

The razor-thin margin by which the proposition passed surprised political commentators, as the measure was overwhelmingly backed by Democrats, who currently have a 2-to-1 voter registration advantage in the state. This result suggests that such a sweeping spending measure in the midst of statewide debt, as well as the obsessive focus on helping the homeless rather than supporting law-abiding and taxpaying citizens, has alienated a significant portion of Democratic voters in the nation’s largest state.

Get the news corporate media won't tell you.

Get caught up on today's must read stores!

By submitting your information, you agree to receive exclusive AG+ content, including special promotions, and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms. By providing your phone number and checking the box to opt in, you are consenting to receive recurring SMS/MMS messages, including automated texts, to that number from my short code. Msg & data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help, STOP to end. SMS opt-in will not be sold, rented, or shared.

About Eric Lendrum

Eric Lendrum graduated from the University of California, Santa Barbara, where he was the Secretary of the College Republicans and the founding chairman of the school’s Young Americans for Freedom chapter. He has interned for Young America’s Foundation, the Heritage Foundation, and the White House, and has worked for numerous campaigns including the 2018 re-election of Congressman Devin Nunes (CA-22). He is currently a co-host of The Right Take podcast.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for Unsk Unsk says:

    $6.4 billion for 4,360 housing units for the homeless? That equates to almost $1.5 million per unit. This on top of the many billions already spent?

    Now I am in favor of housing the homeless; like providing a 150 sf unit in vacant industrial buildings away from other housing, schools and business districts which could probably done for $50k or less for like 40,000 housing in LA County alone which would largely remove the wanton criminality of the homeless purposely unleashed on the populace .

    What is not mentioned in this post is that care for the homeless has become a multi-billion dollar racket for public employee/NGO cabal to enrich themselves and that is where the $6.4 billion is really going. This cabal actually wants and works to make the homeless crisis to get worse- much worse so they can get even more billions. Expect no resolution of the homeless crisis and assault on civil society in California by this measure at all.

  2. SO … what are “conservatives” in the other 49 States going to do to make sure they don’t end up paying for this in the future???
    Hmmm???
    Put on your thinking caps now …

  3. As noted by Unsk, the numbers don’t add up. However, homelessness is a real crisis, especially in CA. The problem negatively affects everyone’s quality of life. It would be nice to see the CA GOP offer up a counter proposal.

  4. This is not truly a “homelessness” spending bill. It’s a developer-subsidy bill designed to provide taxpayer funding to political favorites who will, of course, be “selected” (no bid contracts!) to “build” these units. Yeah, gotcha. Problem is, Democrats are exceptionally stupid and imprudent people who fall for whatever a bill is titled. Let’s call the next spending in Congress by its real name: The Fleecing of Americans Act. Don’t we deserve truth in labeling?

    Years ago, according to my grandparents, (vagrants, drug and alcohol addicts) people were sent to work farms where they were rehabilitated. Everything old is new again!

Continue the discussion at community.amgreatness.com

Participants

Avatar for Unsk Avatar for ThisNameTaken Avatar for Sanders Avatar for Alecto Avatar for system