Merrick Garland Refuses to Prosecute Protesters Terrorizing Supreme Court Justices

On Friday, Attorney General Merrick Garland refused to answer a basic question about whether or not he would be prepared to prosecute protesters who are attempting to intimidate Supreme Court justices outside their homes.

As reported by Just The News, there is a federal law on the books that strictly forbids coordinated efforts to intimidate judges. U.S. code 1507 states that anyone who “pickets or parades” in the vicinity of “a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer,” with the clear “intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer,” will face a fine, or be “imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

As such, Governors Glenn Youngkin (R-Va.) and Larry Hogan (R-Md.), in whose states the majority of Supreme Court justices currently reside, have asked Garland’s Department of Justice (DOJ) to enforce the law by arresting and prosecuting such protesters. Republican lawmakers have made similar demands.

But at an event on Friday at the National Mall for the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, when Garland was asked about enforcing this law, he simply responded “Sorry. I’m here for the memorial.”

Ever since the news was first leaked in early May that the Supreme Court is preparing to overturn the controversial 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide, hundreds of radical, far-left protesters have doxxed the home addresses of six of the Supreme Court justices. There have been numerous pro-abortion protests outside their homes in an attempt to intimidate the justices into changing their minds before the final ruling is made official.

The case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, involves the state of Mississippi passing a law to ban all abortions after 15 weeks. The leaked draft, written by Justice Samuel Alito, appears to have the support of five of the nine justices. The draft suggests that the court’s majority will completely overturn both Roe and the similar 1992 ruling Planned Parenthood v. Casey, and will instead return the question of abortion back to the individual states. Oral arguments in the case were heard in December, and the draft was dated to February. The decision was originally set to be announced in June, but may be released sooner as a result of the leak and subsequent protests.

Get the news corporate media won't tell you.

Get caught up on today's must read stores!

By submitting your information, you agree to receive exclusive AG+ content, including special promotions, and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms. By providing your phone number and checking the box to opt in, you are consenting to receive recurring SMS/MMS messages, including automated texts, to that number from my short code. Msg & data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help, STOP to end. SMS opt-in will not be sold, rented, or shared.

About Eric Lendrum

Eric Lendrum graduated from the University of California, Santa Barbara, where he was the Secretary of the College Republicans and the founding chairman of the school’s Young Americans for Freedom chapter. He has interned for Young America’s Foundation, the Heritage Foundation, and the White House, and has worked for numerous campaigns including the 2018 re-election of Congressman Devin Nunes (CA-22). He is currently a co-host of The Right Take podcast.

Photo: WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 19: U.S. Supreme Court nominee and chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Merrick Garland meets with Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill May 19, 2016 in Washington, DC. Senate Republicans have so far refused to schedule a confirmation hearing for Garland, who was nominated by President Barack Obama to fill a vacancy on the court left when Associate Justice Antonin Scalia died earlier this year. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)