Transgender pronouns, parents’ rights, and the freedom of religion have all landed at the doorstep of the Supreme Court. An Indiana couple is taking the […]
Get the news corporate media won't tell you.
Get caught up on today's must read stores!
By submitting your information, you agree to receive exclusive AG+ content, including special promotions, and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms. By providing your phone number and checking the box to opt in, you are consenting to receive recurring SMS/MMS messages, including automated texts, to that number from my short code. Msg & data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help, STOP to end. SMS opt-in will not be sold, rented, or shared.
Continue the discussion at community.amgreatness.com
Participants
Something’s missing here. Once a referral is closed “unsubstantiated,” that’s it. It’s closed. No further investigation by the CPS social worker. Unless, of course, there are new allegations, an issue not addressed in the article. I realize Indiana child welfare law is different than here in California, but the basics are still the same and there are federal guidelines which must be followed. Still, I cannot imagine the Juvenile Court removing a child under the circumstances described in the article. If indeed the Court authorized removal as the article states, we as a nation are much further along the road to oblivion than I ever thought. And if that’s the case, retirement from the system is so much more gratifying. However, I am more worried than ever about my country.