All eyes remain on the chief justice, to see if he can find a way—any way—to restore to the Court a semblance of that which he has long cherished most, its perceived institutional integrity.
Historians have been willing collaborators as they have always been disposed to act as both judge and jury when it comes to the past. It’s time for a change.
Would our situation look different if National Review and the rest of the legacy conservative media had not surrendered on issues they should have championed?