TEXT JOIN TO 77022

Elizabeth Warren and UnitedHealthcare: Ignorance and Manipulation

In the wake of the murder of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson, many on the political left have demonstrated a level of moral degeneracy that is, paradoxically, both shocking and entirely unsurprising. The celebration of the murder, of its perpetrator, and of the violent populist spirit that animated him has been both off-putting and edifying. They have exposed certain influential figures among the American media and political elites as incorrigibly depraved. More to the point, they have exposed these same figures as monstrously ignorant, not just about the moral necessities of a functional society but also about the fundamentals of governance and finance.

Let us stipulate a few things upfront. First, the most important aspect of this story is the moral dimension. Those who celebrate the premeditated, cold-blooded murder of any individual—and a father of two children, in this case—are wicked. Second, attempting to veil one’s support for murder by first offering a pro forma condemnation of violence is worse than inadequate. It is every bit as monstrous as simply supporting the murder and the murderer outright—maybe even more so. Third, although it is her moral weakness that matters most in this discussion, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren (as well as New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) has also shown herself to be far too ill-informed ever to be taken seriously again.

Warren, as you may know, got caught the other day with her “but” hanging out. “Violence is never the answer,” she conceded, “BUT….” She then went on to explain why she didn’t really mean that violence is never the answer:

…people can be pushed only so far. This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the health care to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone.

What, one might wonder, does Senator Warren mean when she says that this will “ultimately be a threat to everyone”? Does she mean that other CEOs should be worried about being gunned down on the streets? Should all healthcare providers be likewise concerned? Or does she mean to include everyone, everywhere, all people on the face of the earth? Does she think that health insurance is going to be the impetus for global Armageddon?

One supposes she has a specific population in mind, health insurance company CEOs, presumably, but she doesn’t say. Those who understand how government and finance work might wonder if she includes herself on this list of people who should feel threatened. What about AOC and other members of Congress? How about former President Barack Obama?

The simple truth of the matter—which both Senator Warren and Rep. Ocasio-Cortez choose to ignore—is that health insurance in this country is anything but a “private” industry. Indeed, it is almost certainly more a product of government than it is of markets. The American healthcare system—such as it is—had its origins in the wage caps imposed by the National War Labor Board on American business in 1942. Companies could not lure employees with higher wages, and so they did so with fringe benefits, the most notable of which was health insurance. In short, then, the government created the system more than 80 years ago and has been meddling in it ever since.

Today, health insurance is one of the most aggressively micro-managed industries in the country. In large part because of Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, insurers are told what they must cover, whom they must cover, when they must provide coverage, and at what price they must do so. In this sense, the ACA seems like a horrible imposition on health insurers. In truth, however, the companies supported the scheme when it was enacted and are even more enthusiastic about it today. It has been a boon to their operations.

“Obamacare” mandated by law that every single person in the country become a client of a health insurance company (unless they happened to be covered under one of the government’s own price-setting, cost-cutting programs). It created a massive pool of new customers and, in so doing, enhanced insurers’ bottom lines significantly. Because of the massive amount of regulation involved, the ACA also created significant barriers to entry into the industry. What that means is that, in addition to providing insurers with millions of new customers, the federal government also, essentially, killed any potential new competition for the insurers. Nice work, if you can get it.

I have spent the last roughly five years of my career focusing on the government and corporate collusion that is best described as “corporatism.” This sort of corporatist collusion is probably nowhere more developed and burdensome than in the health insurance industry. Or to put it more bluntly for Senator Warren: any problems with health insurance are as much the fault of the government as they are of industry.

Senator Warren and her cohorts celebrating Brian Thompson’s murder also seem to be more than a little confused about who and what UnitedHealthcare is. When they complain about the company, its policies, and especially its profits, they speak of it as if it were some living, breathing entity. Obviously, it is not. The “company” is comprised of millions of different people. When UnitedHealthcare earns a profit, for example, that profit doesn’t go to some big, otherwise empty building somewhere, and it doesn’t go to Brian Thompson or any of the other executives in the company. It goes to the shareholders, both in the form of dividends and (usually) higher share prices. Thompson was merely the agent for the shareholders. Everything he did that benefitted “the company” benefitted its shareholders. That’s how publicly traded companies work.

Who, then, are the shareholders of United Healthcare? Well…given that it’s an S&P 500 company, almost anyone who has a 401(k) or an IRA that invests in index funds is a United Healthcare shareholder. Interestingly, because she joined Congress after January 1, 2013, Senator Elizabeth Warren is a member of the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS), which includes a basic retirement annuity, Social Security, and mandatory participation in the Thrift Savings Plan. The Thrift Savings Plan, in turn, has one “fund” that is its most popular and generally produces its best returns. That is its “C Fund”—a common stock fund that is built to “match the performance of the Standard and Poor’s 500 (S&P 500) Index.” We can safely assume that Senator Warren has some of her TPS money in the C Fund, which means that we safely assume that Senator Warren is a shareholder of United Healthcare. Brian Thompson may have done some things as the CEO of United Healthcare that made people angry or unhappy, but he only did so as the agent of people like Elizabeth Warren. She, not he, was the ultimate beneficiary of whatever the company did to “push people” too far.

Elizabeth Warren is not stupid. One would presume that she knows all of this. And yet…

One has no choice but to conclude that Senator Warren is incredibly ignorant, incredibly manipulative, or some combination of the two.

If I were a betting man, I’d bet on Option 3.

Get the news corporate media won't tell you.

Get caught up on today's must read stores!

By submitting your information, you agree to receive exclusive AG+ content, including special promotions, and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms. By providing your phone number and checking the box to opt in, you are consenting to receive recurring SMS/MMS messages, including automated texts, to that number from my short code. Msg & data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help, STOP to end. SMS opt-in will not be sold, rented, or shared.

About Stephen Soukup

Stephen R. Soukup is the Director of The Political Forum Institute and the author of The Dictatorship of Woke Capital (Encounter, 2021, 2023)

Notable Replies

  1. If I every needed proof that the public’s memory is quite short, the demogogy surrounding “health care” would provide it.

    First off, having insurance is not having access to healthcare…that verbal conflation has driven me crazy since it first appeared, particularly since the government’s push to force everyone to have health insurance has both skyrocketed prices for medical care and driven most small medical practices out of existence.

    And, yet, that bit of wordsmithing is part of what fueled the assassination of Brian Thompson. By creating that equivalency in people’s minds, our own government set the stage for the cold-blooded execution of a man for the position he held in an unpopular industry and the truly sick reaction from entirely too many individuals in this country.

    Luigi Mangione bought into that idea, as well. I have little doubt that his back injury was the first time in his life that money and familial connections couldn’t get him what he wanted – a return to the life he had. And I can sympathize with him & the hundreds of thousands of people who live with chronic pain but that doesn’t justify ambushing a man who had nothing to do with issues Mangione may have had with his insurance coverage; it’s just narcissism raised the the nth degree and the insidious messaging from our government coming to fruition.

    Nobody who has ever filed an insurance claim has enjoyed the process. It is a long, frustrating, stressful process. It took almost a year to see the full financial damage and argue my insurance provider into actually paying out the claim after I had emergency surgery to keep a brain aneurysm from ending my life. If you find your interactions with the insurance company onerous, you can thank your government and lawyers for the experience.

    I think Mr.Soukup is crediting Elizabeth Warren with more intelligence that she merits because ideologues are rarely truly intelligent people. She, like AOC, is further proof that one does not need to be smart to earn a degree, merely moderately studious (we’ve seen a lot of this phenomenon lately). I don’t think it ever occurred to either of these women that, if you follow premise to its logical conclusion, they are at least as culpable for the current system & infinitely more able to effect change within it than Brian Thompson. Despite the coy ‘violence is not the answer’ preface to their statements, they are directly connected to the root of the problem and if they are going to, by failure to condemn it full-throatedly, endorse violence, maybe THEY are the problem.

  2. Avatar for task task says:

    This was a very good article.

    Everything the author and you say is on target but more needs to be said. Fortunately you survived. Natasha Richardson did not. I can go to great lengths discussing the shortfalls of socialist medicine and surgery as opposed to the capitalistic American version but I don’t have time today. The AMA has been infiltrated. It is woke. But even with the clear unambiguous vision of the vaccine mandates and lockdowns in the rear view mirror it is still apparent that American Medicine still works better despite being under the yoke of the woke Affordable Care Act. Fixing that Act is no easy task because it is designed to fail from inception and it was also designed, like the Bismarck, to survive legislative attacks. It was meant to allow Harris to introduce a single payer revision which would have been supported by non deceased RINO’s such as John McCain.

Continue the discussion at community.amgreatness.com

Participants

Avatar for themadgardener Avatar for system Avatar for task