TEXT JOIN TO 77022

Massie: FBI, CDC & Legacy Media Conspire to Hide Armed Self Defense Data

Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY) says there’s a concerted effort by the federal government and the legacy media to “debunk” the fact that guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens prevent crime and stop mass shooters.

Massie was referring to an article by Dr. John R. Lott Jr. that makes the case that the FBI, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and legacy media outlets regularly suppress and hide data that proves that an armed citizenry is one of the most effective deterrents to a mass casualty attacks.


High profile crimes, like the school shooting in Georgia that took 4 lives on Wednesday, tend to bring out the political and media opportunists who use the emotional leverage of sorrow and outrage to lobby for more stringent controls on private firearms ownership.

In his article, Dr. Lott cites examples of how legacy media plays up the idea that “good guys with guns keep failing to stop mass shootings.”

Meanwhile, the CDC has removed its estimates of defensive gun uses from its website after a 2013 report from the National Academies of Sciences showed that citizens use guns to stop crime anywhere from 64,000 to 3 million times a year. That data was removed after the CDC was lobbied by a gun control organization to remove it because it was being cited by “gun rights folks” to stop gun control legislation.

Lott also calls into question how the FBI defines an active shooter attack so loosely as to include any shooting in a public place whether a single person was shot at and missed or a number of people were shot and killed. The Texas University researchers that the FBI hired to compile its list, depended on Google searches of news stories for their data.

Lott says that means they were relying on a dataset that was actively predisposed to report in a way that was hostile to guns in the hands of private citizens.

As a result, of the 350 active shooter cases between 2014 to 2023, the FBI reported that only 14 of those shooters were stopped by armed citizens.

Lott’s Crime Prevention Research Center found that of 515 active shooter incidents between 2014 to 2023, armed citizens stopped 180, and that’s excluding 27 cases in which an armed citizen stopped a shooter before he could fire a shot.

As the election draws nearer, the gun control rhetoric is already intensifying.

Rep. Massie has a reminder for the next president of what the Second Amendment is really about.

Get the news corporate media won't tell you.

Get caught up on today's must read stores!

By submitting your information, you agree to receive exclusive AG+ content, including special promotions, and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms. By providing your phone number and checking the box to opt in, you are consenting to receive recurring SMS/MMS messages, including automated texts, to that number from my short code. Msg & data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help, STOP to end. SMS opt-in will not be sold, rented, or shared.

Notable Replies

  1. This is hardly new. The feds and the CDC have been manipulating the statistical data relating to firearms for decades-- everything from including gang activity in mass shooting stats to not separating homicides in the commission of a crime, officer-involved shootings and suicides from other homicides.

    They have been aided in this obsfucation by the notoriously short memory of the public. Remember the dire predictions about what would happen when Florida passed its concealed carry law after a upsurge in carjackings? Nothing except carjackers targeting rental cars instead of locals because it was safer for criminals to target people who could not, by definition, be armed. Or how about Australia’s mandatory gun confiscation, which shifted violent attacks from firearms to knives, bats and IUDs

    What these a-holes fail to recognize is two-fold…criminals do not give a damn about what is legal and a person bent on killing another will find a way to do so. Hiding the truth of what statics prove about the positive impact of legal gun ownership in order to abridge my right to self-protection doesn’t make their argument stronger; it just shows how weak it was in the first place.

Continue the discussion at community.amgreatness.com

Participants

Avatar for themadgardener Avatar for system