The iconic photo of Donald Trump standing tall and defiantly after an attempted assassination speaks volumes. It reminds the whole world that Trump is a fighter. In his case, it is more than a metaphor, as “fighter” is for most of the political class. He showed real physical courage, and this cannot fail to impress.
As society has gotten more modern and organized, physical courage has become less necessary and less valued. Physical ability in general, such as the brawn and endurance required to be a cowboy or coal miner, doesn’t have much to do with the ability to analyze Excel spreadsheets, run a cash register, or do any number of office jobs. Softer skills are in higher demand and are rewarded accordingly.
We are a wealthy and safe society, but also an antiseptic and, in some ways, inhuman one. Our nature does best with purpose and hardship. The modern quest for comfortable self-preservation is a philosophy of life fit only for an amoeba.
The overreaction to COVID in particular was a testament to the recent, feminized obsession with safety, which downplays the value of risk-taking and enjoying life. When the virus arrived, the people in charge reminded us that they think we’re merely vulnerable and stupid toddlers. At the same time, they showed us that they themselves are cowards in the face of risk, willing to destroy the economy, religious freedoms, and our health in an impossible quest to eliminate a highly communicable disease. Schoolmarms like former CDC head Rochelle Walensky and weasels like Anthony Fauci became avatars of our decadent, dishonest, and cowardly ruling class.
While physical courage never fails to impress, during difficult times, the esteem of physical courage particularly reasserts itself. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, firemen and other first responders were back in style, displacing the wealthy and well-dressed “masters of the universe” on Wall Street. When the Twin Towers were burning, the order of things became inverted, and now brave working-class men willing to walk into burning buildings were calling the shots and saving the office workers.
This is also the reason, particularly in the era of the all-volunteer military, that our service members have always been held in high regard. Their value does not depend so much on the use to which they are put. Americans have fierce disagreements and a lot of criticism of our foreign policy. But the willingness to risk one’s life over and over again is something that onlookers admire, not least because this is a risk pursued voluntarily.
Trump’s courage extends beyond the moment caught on camera. His candidacy and post-presidency all exemplify, if not physical, then moral courage, including high levels of commitment and resilience. If other politicians come into office poor and leave wealthy, Trump’s experience has been quite the opposite.
By becoming president, he has lost a lot of money and been subject to constant attack, beginning with illegal FBI surveillance of him during his campaign in 2016, the hounding and stress of false Russian collusion allegations, insubordination by senior military and civilian leaders, and two impeachments. Not merely taking a financial loss, he has endured lawfare on a grand scale, including scurrilous attacks on his reputation, a baseless civil judgment against his businesses, and four simultaneous criminal prosecutions.
Even under this degree of pressure and attack, Trump did not quit and did not waver. In times of stress, he remains cognizant that his reactions are part of a broader performance. Such self-consciousness about the performative aspect of one’s actions and reactions is, in fact, an important part of leadership. That is to say, a leader must be aware of his reactions to events and how his supporters’ morale will be affected by such reactions. Trump could have gone passively with the Secret Service, ducked on his own, or panicked. Instead, he demanded to walk out under his own power and shook his fist defiantly, blood streaming down his face, yelling, “Fight! Fight! Fight!”
His supporters, understandably rattled by the incident, cheered wildly. So did his many millions of supporters around the country. It was all very in character, turning a disturbing lapse of security into a demonstration of great physical courage under fire, literally.
Trump’s reaction to the shooting reminded me of documentary footage I saw a long time ago, back when the History Channel actually taught history, involving France’s larger-than-life 20th century leader, Charles de Gaulle. It was important for de Gaulle that his Free French Forces be the tip of the spear for the allied liberation of Paris. The Supreme Allied Commander, General Eisenhower, with his strategic and diplomatic acumen, agreed to this request.
The Free French Forces ended up capturing Paris so quickly after the breakout from the Normandy Beachhead that a handful of German forces and Vichy collaborators remained in the city. During an impromptu victory parade, de Gaulle and the crowd were subject to shots from snipers. When everyone else ducked, ran for cover, or cowered, de Gaulle stood tall, not even so much as flinching. He went on to become a popular and polarizing leader of postwar France.
In our highly regulated and rationalistic age, we sometimes forget the importance of emotions and the primitive gestures that have demonstrated leadership ability (or its absence) since time immemorial. Even today, the best leaders remain sensible of this type of language that communicates powerfully and without words.
Trump is a master of the show and a man of masculine instinct in the age of the verbose blockhead. Inches from death, Trump’s mind remained on his mission, and he was conscious of the way the images of him would affect the campaign. This kind of physical courage cannot be faked, and for a campaign that was already doing well, it now appears unstoppable.
***
Christopher Roach is an adjunct fellow of the Center for American Greatness and an attorney in private practice based in Florida. He is a double graduate of the University of Chicago and has previously been published by The Federalist, Takimag, Chronicles, the Washington Legal Foundation, the Marine Corps Gazette, and the Orlando Sentinel. The views presented are solely his own.
As some commentators have pointed out, a bloodied Trump standing up right after the assassination attempt, holding his right fist forth with Secret Service agents protectively bunched around him, is a moment and an image as iconic and inspirational as the raising of the flag on Iwo Jima. His reelection was assured before the attempt on his life. Now, he’s likely also to win the popular vote by an even larger margin, which, as anyone who knows politics is all too aware, creates the kind of mandate needed to clean house. Did I mention that the iconic image included the American flag waving above Trump?
I’m still waiting for the photos when Hillary was landing in Bosnia under sniper fire.
haha
When Trump came into the Convention Hall last night my wife remarked his face looked a bit pinched as if he were in pain. I said it’s possible his ear was hurting, but it could also be his new realization of how fragile life is. How much of an impact the assassination attempt will have on him may take some time to unfold, but I do not doubt it had an impact.
Quietly whispered only to oneself is also the thought (dare one say it) that the hand of God is truly on this man. It wasn’t until after he was elected (I think mid 2017) I began coming across a number of modern prophets on YouTube claiming that Donald Trump had been chosen by God for us and for this time. Prophets always make me nervous----not because of what they might proclaim, but because I’m never entirely sure their words are coming from God. And the danger of following a false prophet is more dangerous to the soul than committing almost any other act.
So I take their proclamations with the entire Morton Salt Box.
One of these men caught my eye and ear more than most though. His name was Kim Clement. Strange guy, and even stranger delivery of message, but his words have stuck with me more than any other. Clement started mentioning Donald Trump would be president back as early as 2007. What struck me the most was his word painting of the coming “trump” as a man like David. He portrayed the trump as a flawed man, just like David, but as Clement stated—“he is a man after mine own heart.” Clement said that Trump would hold two terms in office. When Donald Trump was defeated in 2020 I thought that put paid to another religious con man. And then Trump came back.
And then Trump came back. (I know I repeated). And then came the lawfare, one after another. Each one would have broken anyone else. Each one made him stronger. Clement would say----“My hand is on this man. My man.” and, “I am sending him to confound. I am sending him to rebuke.” And lastly, “He shall be elected to a second term to show that I AM GOD!”
After Saturday, this whole thing has got me talking to myself. What are the odds, I wonder, that a split second turn of the head would turn potential disaster into an amazing wonder of survival?
Joe gets exposed in a disastrous debate performance. The Supreme Court rules on Immunity and the legality of the Jack Smith Appointment, putting all four cases at risk. Trump rises triumphant from Saturday’s assassination attempt. Judge Cannon dismisses the Document’s case. Boom. Boom. Boom. Boom. Like mortars falling on the enemy’s position–each round landing exactly where the enemy is clustered. What are the odds? Can odds even be calculated?
I am not here to proselytize. I am not here to convert. I am not here to preach. I am just here in wonder and wondering----could it really be?
I hate to be a male Cassandra, but I would caution my friends here on AG to moderate their expectations for November. As I tell my sales team about quoting lead times, “better have them surprised than disappointed.” So let’s not forget the bitter disappointments of November 2020 and November 2022, and scale our expectations proportionally.
Let’s remember a few things:
1 - Low information voters are called low information voters for a reason. And there are lots more of them on the Left.
2 - Emotion has a much more impactful and immediate influence on human behavior than reason. And there are lots more emotional voters on the Left.
3 - All the MSM are arrayed against Trump. That, depending on whom you listen to, is worth at least a good 10 percentage points.
4 - Democrats have normalized cheating, so much so that we expect it as something as natural as the rising of the Sun.
5 - Biden and his cohorts still have the bully pulpit. Incumbency comes with lots of marketing advantages.
6 - The Left has done such a thorough job demonizing Trump (as well as us, his voters) that there is a sizeable bloc of the electorate that won’t change its mind no matter how blatant Biden’s failures.
7 - And lastly, the International, globalist Left (including the CCP), the deep state and the Neocon cabals have way too many interests at stake to merely let We The People (ugh!) decide who will be our next President. If you think 2020 was fishy, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.
What I’m driving at, is let’s not pretend that this is in the bag, only to feel cheated and disappointed in November. Yes, there is a stronger chance that we’ll pull off a win, but let’s keep humble and realistic–and let’s leave hubristic senses of security to the Left. Time for hope, prayers, and celebration that our candidate is strong and doing well–for everything else let’s wait 'til November.
We will never know. But a landslide victory in November, in the face of intent to commit fraud by Trump’s enemies, would definitely cement the idea in the minds of believers.