Newly obtained documents from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reveal that before the FDA approved the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shots, the United States and United Kingdom health regulators struck a deal to keep information about vaccine injuries hidden from the public.
Judicial Watch obtained the 57 pages of heavily redacted records through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against HHS.
Judicial Watch received records that show, prior to FDA approval of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, a discussion between U.S/UK health regulators regarding the COVID shot & “anaphylaxis” w/the regulators emphasizing their “mutual confidentiality agreement.” READ: https://t.co/zagOz7sdr5
— Judicial Watch ⚖️ (@JudicialWatch) February 16, 2023
In a Dec. 9, 2020 email exchange, U.S. and UK regulators discussed anaphylaxis responses and adverse events related to the vaccine under “our confidentiality agreement.”
The email exchange included former FDA vaccine advisory committee member Philip Krause and officials with the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Dr. Marion Gruber, the former director of the F.D.A.’s vaccines office, and Dr. Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Krause asked if it was possible to talk under “our confidentiality agreement” ahead of the FDA vaccine advisory meeting scheduled for Dec. 10, 2020.
Marks also referenced the “mutual confidentiality agreement” with the MHRA in an email stating, “it would be very helpful if our Office of Vaccines could receive additional details on [redacted] from MHRA under the terms of our mutual confidentiality agreement.”
Jonathan Mogford, policy director of the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, provided background information on “two cases of anaphylactoid reactions in individuals with a strong past history of allergic reactions….”
Mogford later added “… attached are [redacted] hope that’s helpful in the meantime. If I can just remind – information shared under our confidentiality agreement.”
The FDA issued its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID “vaccine” for individuals 16 years of age and older on December 11, 2020
On May 14, 2021, the CDC’s Dr. Amanda Cohn emailed Gruber and Marks with the subject line “Coadministration of COVID-19 Vaccines with Other Vaccines During Pregnancy.”
Gruber wrote, “I am fine with this language.” Marks then responded to Cohn and her CDC colleague, Sarah Mbaeyi, “I can live with this too. Please let me know if you want to connect about the adverse event issue later today. Seems like work is still ongoing, but let me know. Thanks.”
Cohn replied, “We have a meeting with Rochelle [presumably CDC Director Rochelle Walensky] at 3:30 about if we should say anything or wait until we have more definitive information. I will let you know where we land. I’m not sure there is a right answer.”
A preprint paper shows that “pregnancy complications and menstrual abnormalities are significantly more frequent following COVID-19 vaccinations than Influenza vaccinations.” Pfizer Director Dr. Jordan Trishton Walker recently acknowledged on hidden video that the company has concerns regarding the potential negative impacts its mRNA products are having on women’s reproductive systems.
Both Krause and Gruber resigned in the fall of 2021 over the Biden regime’s plan to push COVID-19 booster shots on people months after they received their second shot.
“It again took a lawsuit for the Biden administration to hand over, albeit heavily redacted, information regarding the safety of the COVID vaccines that the public has every right to know,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “This disturbing batch of new documents have uncovered a secret confidentiality agreement tied to COVID vaccine safety issues and emails that raise new questions about the vaccines and pregnancy.”
Fitton said in an interview with Just the News that the new information is “troubling,” and “the documents speak for themselves.”
“Why are we engaged in a secret deal to keep secret information about adverse events related to the vaccines?” he asked. “I just think it’s troubling. The documents speak for themselves.”
Fitton noted that this isn’t the first time the watchdog has caught U.S. officials striking a secret deal to suppress information during the pandemic.
“It’s not the first time we’ve seen this,” he said. “Back when COVID first emerged, we uncovered documents showing there was an agreement with the Chinese where they dictated terms of secrecy and an agreement in exchange for our ability to go over there. And it looks like in order to look at what information they had on the virus at the time. Obviously, they weren’t terribly forthcoming.”
HUGE: Secret Deal to Hide Details on Vaccine Adverse Events? pic.twitter.com/PhBNeanB76
— Judicial Watch ⚖️ (@JudicialWatch) February 16, 2023