The FDA’s authorization of the experimental COVID injections in babies and toddlers is starting to see serious pushback from health freedom organizations and the media, amid early safety signals that show the jabs are risky and inappropriate for young children.
In mid-June, the FDA authorized Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots for youngsters ages six months to five years, as well as Moderna’s shots for youngsters ages six months to six years.
A recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal titled “Why the Rush For Toddler Vaccines?” points out that there have been virtually no deaths in kids under five from COVID. Only 209 children between six months and four years old have died from the virus, the Journal’s Allysia Finley reports.
Moreover, the clinical trials did not prove the injections are safe and effective for babies and toddlers. Quite the contrary.
“Vaccinated toddlers in Pfizer’s trial were more likely to get severely ill with Covid than those who received a placebo,” Finley writes. “Pfizer claimed most severe cases weren’t ‘clinically significant,’ whatever that means, but this was all the more reason that the FDA should have required a longer follow-up before authorizing the vaccine.”
Also worrisome: Most of the kids who developed multiple infections during the trial were vaccinated. This warrants more investigation, since experimental vaccines for other diseases sometimes increase susceptibility to infection.
Scientists are also discovering that triple-vaccinated adults who were previously infected with the Wuhan variant have a weaker immune response to Omicron, leaving them more susceptible to reinfection. This phenomenon, called “immunological imprinting,” could explain why children who received three Pfizer shots were more likely to get reinfected.
In Uruguay, meanwhile, a court on Thursday suspended COVID shots for children under age of 13. The Public Health Ministry and the president’s office have 72 hours to appeal the decision, and if successful, a court would need to address the question again next month.
In the United Kingdom, dozens of doctors have sent a letter to the Medical and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and other UK government officials, urging them to not make the same mistake the FDA did in authorizing COVID vaccinations in infants and young children:
We would urge you to consider very carefully the move to vaccinate ever younger children against SARS-CoV-2, despite the gradual but significant reducing virulence of successive variants, the increasing evidence of rapidly waning vaccine efficacy, the increasing concerns over long-term vaccine harms, and the knowledge that the vast majority of this young age group have already been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 repeatedly and have demonstrably effective immunity. . . .
Thus, the balance of benefit and risk which supported the rollout of mRNA vaccines to the elderly and vulnerable in 2021 is totally inappropriate for small children in 2022.
An independent Ireland-based paper called the Irish Light reported last month that heart disease in children has exploded since the jabs were authorized for young people.
“The greatest crime ever committed by an Irish government—and there have been many—will not be concealed from the Irish people for much longer,” the paper declared.
As hard as the HSE tries to cover up the horrifying impact of the covid vaccine on Irish children, there is no containing the staggering toll of sudden deaths in young people. Almost daily, the faces of sporty teenagers and newborn infants appear on the pages of RIP. ie: perfectly healthy children struck down by a fatal heart attack, stroke or sudden unexplained death.
Earlier this week, Naomi Wolf of Daily Clout and the Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF), filed a citizen’s petition with the FDA to request a reversal or at least pause of their EUA for COVID-19 vaccines for six month-olds to under-fives.
The petition asks that the agency “further study the research available, including the research itemizing harms described above, and that they take into account over 130,000 comments submitted to the FDA regarding the dangerous step of authorizing these shots for young children, which they are legally required to consider.”
Less than a month after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted emergency use authorization (EUA) to Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 shots for babies and toddlers, alarming safety signals have already been observed.
Doctors and nurses are seeing an uptick in seizures and rashes in two- and three-year-olds who were recently vaccinated, according to COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund (CETF) founder Steve Kirsch.
The good news is, data from several states show that the vast majority of parents are rejecting the mRNA shots for their young children.
At least anecdotally, however, it appears that a minority of COVID vax enthusiasts may be putting their little ones at risk.
“I’m getting multiple reports from my nurse friends about kids 2 and 3 years old having seizures,” Kirsch reported on his Substack. “It is ONLY happening on vaccinated kids, and symptoms start 2 to 5 days after the COVID vaccine.”
Kirsch said that the only thing that the sick toddlers have in common is that they were administered the shots two to five days earlier.
“The doctors cannot figure out what is causing the seizures (since it couldn’t be the vaccine since those are safe and effective),” Kirsch quipped, adding, “the medical staff is not permitted to talk about the cases to the press or on social media or they will be fired.”
On October 29, the FDA granted Pfizer an EUA for children ages five- to 11-years-old in the United States. By early December, nearly 5 million of those children had been injected, and according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, zero safety signals had been found in this cohort.
“We haven’t seen anything yet,” Walensky told ABC News. “We have an incredibly robust vaccine safety system, and so if [problems] were there, we would find it.”
But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) last month admitted that the agency never analyzed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines.
The admission was revealed in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).
If the new vaccine shows a significantly higher reporting rate of a particular adverse event relative to the old one, it counts as a safety signal that should then trigger a more thorough investigation.
The briefing document states, “CDC will perform PRR data mining on a weekly basis or as needed.”
And yet, in the agency’s response to the FOIA request, it wrote that “no PRRs were conducted by CDC. Furthermore, data mining is outside of the agency’s purview.”
On June 23, U.S. Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) fired off a letter to Walensky, requesting “copies of all tables, analyses and reports generated in connection with the “Signal Detection Analyses” to see if the CDC actually performed the necessary surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, as claimed. He asked that the agency provide this information no later than July 7, 2022.
Substacker Etana Hecht reports that since December, “one of the largest casket manufacturers in North America” has seen a 400 percent increase in sales of small-size caskets.
“For the first time in over 30 years in business, they’ve begun to receive orders for small-size caskets in bulk,” she reported. According to the casket manufacturer, their sales of adult-sized caskets have increased by 20 percent.
Hecht tweeted that she also spoke recently with funeral directors who have seen a surge in child deaths since the jabs were authorized.
“They’ve told me they can’t talk about it,” she said. “There’s basically an unwritten law that you don’t speak about the deceased if you’re in the industry, similar to how doctors keep things private.”
Daily Clout and HFDF say the FDA has fallen down on the job, and that they are prepared to take legal action against the regulatory agency should it decline to reverse its authorization.
“The FDA is charged with protecting public health, not marketing the products of arguably the most powerful industry in the world,” they said.
The HFDF has already had success in the courts fighting the Biden Administration’s COVID policies. Back in April, the organization won a federal lawsuit challenging the federal government’s Travel Mask Mandate.
The decision, by a U.S. District Court judge in Florida, invalidated the order by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) requiring that masks be worn on airplanes, trains, buses, and other travel conveyances and in transportation hubs.
Wolf argues the FDA “has abandoned its duty to protect the American people” with its authorization of the experimental COVID shots for babies and toddlers.
COVID-19 poses statistically insignificant risk to babies and young children, and neither safety nor efficacy of the injections have been proven. But research from the WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers, along with analyses of official databases, primary source documents, and peer-reviewed studies, shows that the mRNA vaccines damage many teens’ hearts, leave babies with GI problems, sleep problems, seizures, liver damage, and multiorgan system failure, and suppress leukocytes; the vaccines visibly damaged the hearts of animals in studies. Why on earth would we thus risk the health of small children and babies?
Leslie Manookian, president of Health Freedom Defense Fund, said in a statement:
Aside from not performing as purported, the injections pose serious known and unknown risks to young children. Leaked data from Japan revealed high levels of the lipid nanoparticles from the mRNA shots accumulate in the ovaries with unknown consequences. But menstrual irregularities and increased rates of miscarriage have been reported after the injections. A recent study identified reduced sperm concentrations and effects on sperm motility. With these safety concerns in mind, FDA authorizing the injections for young children defies reason and the precautionary principle.
Wolf explained on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast on Tuesday that the petition is just the beginning.
“A citizen’s petition is a first step toward additional legal action against the FDA if they don’t stop,” she said.