What matters on Twitter . . . often just stays on Twitter.
Those who use the platform to voice opinions on faith, politics, guns, culture, the military, the police and a whole host of other issues just aren’t representative of popular opinion. They tend to hold positions not just to the left but to the far, far left.
Journalists, who are among the worst Twitter addicts, seize on those positions as if in church. They craft ideas from them; they turn out stories based on the thinking that goes on within that bubble. What they produce rarely comes from anything that resembles a reasonable set of views.
Jump on Twitter to check on culture any hour of the day, and you’d be inclined to believe everyone wants to defund the police; that only racists believe critical race theory should be scrutinized; that all white people are bigots because of history; that no one wants voter ID; that there is no crisis at the border.
If you jumped on Twitter after grilling on Father’s Day, you might have been inclined to believe that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis had somehow orchestrated an assassination attempt against Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) during a Pride parade in the Sunshine State. That is because, within moments of a car crashing into the parade, news reports led with stories about a white man in a pickup truck causing a “tragic accident” in scare quotes.
Within moments, the mayor of Fort Lauderdale, Dean Trantalis, said it was a “terrorist attack against the LGBT community” and “intentional,” and soon, “#DeathSantis” was trending on Twitter, linking the tragedy to the Florida governor. Chris Hahn, who has a blue-checked verified account and is a Democratic strategist, tweeted, “Ron DeSantis and the rest of the Florida GOP have blood on their hands.”
There were plenty of verified blue-checked Twitter accounts to jump on that bandwagon; it took hours, as stories often do, for the police to make the truth known: The tragic event was indeed just a tragic accident. In fact, the lethally errant driver had been a member of the Fort Lauderdale Gay Men’s Chorus.
Jump on Twitter ahead of a big political race like the New York mayoral primary on Tuesday, and you’d be inclined to believe that one of the two liberal darlings in the race—either Maya Wiley, a former counsel to Mayor Bill de Blasio, or former Sanitation Commissioner Kathryn Garcia—would walk away with the Democratic Party’s nomination. Instead, Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams, the former cop who ran on a message focused on public safety, emerged with a substantial lead in the first preference tally. The count could take weeks, and there is still a long-shot chance that Adams will not win, but his candidacy has already shown that one’s status as a Twitter darling does not mean one is connecting with voters on issues that matter to them.
In a story I did for the New York Post six months ago on the primary race, voter sentiments and polling showed Adams and Andrew Yang were leading the pack and that reducing crime and creating more jobs, not wokeness, were at the top of the list for New York City voters.
A tweet CNN wrote Saturday rightly drew scrutiny from Dave Wasserman of the Cook Political Report that read: “Georgia removes 100,000 names from voter registration rolls.”
Wasserman noted in a tweet that “once again, a major news outlet’s headline omits the rather important detail that every state routinely removes moved/inactive voters from their rolls as a best practice of election administration.”
Wasserman added that in a click-driven age, and given the stakes, it is imperative for news organizations to be careful and clear.
Because of its lack of context, the tweet stoked division because Georgia has a Republican governor who recently signed a voting law that gave executives at corporations such as Delta, Coca-Cola and Major League Baseball an attack of the vapors.
Accurate, relevant information rarely appears in tweets because news organizations know they are catering to a lefty audience, serving up exactly what that audience wants to consume and discuss. Make it crazy enough, and maybe their story will even trend on Twitter!
Then again, Twitter is not very representative of America. Heck, it isn’t even representative of Democrats. A recent Pew Research Survey on Twitter use concluded just 10 percent of users produced an astonishing 92 percent of all tweets, and nearly 69 percent of those highly prolific users are Democrats. That alone should put to rest the idea that anything that happens on Twitter represents the real world.
But a closer look also reveals that the Democrats using Twitter are far more liberal than the Democrats who are not on Twitter.
In short, if you are on Twitter to get a sense of what an average Democrat thinks about an issue—the way too many journalists, strategists and candidates seem to do—your sense is going to be skewed. You are not reading average Democratic viewpoints.
Nor are you getting a good sense of reality. For example, if there were indeed no crisis on the border, why would Vice President Kamala Harris finally be going there? If people in New York City really did believe that the police should be defunded, why did Adams finish first among the mayoral candidates, and why would Joe Biden now be calling to re-fund the police, doubling federal funding that pays state and local governments to hire more police officers?
COPYRIGHT 2021 CREATORS.COM