Biden-Harris Would Deal a Huge Blow to Religious Liberty

Toward the end of Vice President Mike Pence’s resounding defeat of Sen. Kamala Harris in Wednesday night’s vice presidential debate, the two officials tussled on the pending Supreme Court nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett and the despicable deluge of anti-Catholic bigotry her nomination has unleashed. Harris, one of the leading arsonists during the well-orchestrated 2018 character assassination of then-Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, tried to mollify wary voters in advance of Barrett’s own impending confirmation hearings. “Joe Biden and I are both people of faith,” Harris hectored, “and it’s insulting to suggest that we would knock anyone for their faith.”

Perhaps Biden and Harris are privately religious; perhaps they are not. It would be rather uncouth to aimlessly speculate as to the personal relationship each has with the Creator. But it is entirely fair game to review their historical records, their past statements and their present platform in order to preview what stances their prospective administration would take on matters pertaining to religious liberty. By any remotely fair standard, a Biden-Harris administration would represent a grievous setback for the constitutionally enshrined religious liberty of all Americans.

At a theoretical level, it has never been clearer that progressivism, the (misnamed) pseudo-intellectual tail that wags the Democratic Party dog, despises religiosity. Modern leftists, political inheritors of Karl Marx’s infamous “opiate of the masses” broadside against the Judeo-Christian tradition, are wont to view religion as an atavistic roadblock to full human “enlightenment.” They recoil at the notion that an intelligent person can actually believe biblical truth — can actually believe in the divinity of Scripture.

Practically, card-carrying progressives tout religion — anchored as it is in the family and communitarian institutions, such as churches and synagogues — as a destructive hindrance to their political goals of radical autonomy, an expanded welfare state and the ultimate dissolution of the traditional nation-state in favor of global governance. Scratch a Sen. Bernie Sanders supporter enough and you’ll assuredly hear such nostrums espoused. On the 21st-century left, such claptrap rules the roost.

A Biden-Harris ticket would support nationally enshrined taxpayer-funded on-demand abortion throughout the entire gestational cycle. Biden, who once pretended to follow the late Mario Cuomo in the Kabuki theater that is, “I’m personally pro-life but support a woman’s right to choose,” went so far this election cycle as to disavow his decades-long support of the Hyde Amendment — the longstanding federal ban on taxpayer subsidization of that most grisly snuffing out of unborn human life. Harris has been vocal about her so-called Reproductive Rights Act, which would flip federalism on its head and call for Justice Department “preclearance” before any state-level abortion restriction might be enforced. We have come a long — and murderous — way from the Court’s decrees in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which, while lawless, at least feigned interest in fetal health.

A Biden-Harris administration would be a disaster for conscience protection. They would follow the lead of Barack Obama, who shamefully took a convent of nuns to court for years to try to coerce them to violate their faith and subsidize abortifacients, and aggressively prosecute men and women of faith — the First Amendment and relevant statutory law, such as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, notwithstanding. Lamentable ordeals like the legal travails of Colorado baker Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, would become ubiquitous. Discriminate, disparate targeting of religious Americans, recently previewed by the noxious COVID-19 scapegoating of the nation’s largest Jewish community by Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio, offer a harrowing preview of what could be to come.

A Biden-Harris administration would also stack the federal judiciary — at the level of both the Supreme Court and the lower courts — with jurists deeply hostile to conscience rights and deeply committed to the progressive political agenda. Religious liberty has, for years, been a relatively rare bastion of conservative jurisprudential success; witness, for example, the Obama administration’s embarrassing 9-0 defeat in the 2012 “ministerial exception” case of Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Biden and Harris are deliberately hiding from the masses any list of possible Supreme Court nominees, and the very nature of that cowardly dissemblance belies the notion that their nominees would be anything other than radical. The blunt truth is that Biden’s potential nominees to the (likely “packed”) Court, such as Pamela Karlan, would be well to the left of Obama’s own reliably liberal nominees.

The Trump administration, despite the morally checkered past of the president himself, has been a deeply loyal and committed friend of religious and traditionalist Americans. It would truly be a shame for that progress — actual progress, in contrast to the false gods of “progressivism” — to now be squandered.

COPYRIGHT 2020 CREATORS.COM

About Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer is the opinion editor of Newsweek. A popular conservative commentator, he is of counsel at First Liberty Institute and a syndicated columnist through Creators. A frequent pundit on political, legal and cultural issues, Hammer is a constitutional attorney by training. He is a former John Marshall Fellow of the Claremont Institute and was a law clerk for Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah).

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Support Free & Independent Journalism Your support helps protect our independence so that American Greatness can keep delivering top-quality, independent journalism that's free to everyone. Every contribution, however big or small, helps secure our future. If you can, please consider a recurring monthly donation.

Want news updates?

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

3 responses to “Biden-Harris Would Deal a Huge Blow to Religious Liberty”

  1. “despite the morally checkered past of the president himself,”

    That was totally unnecessary. It has zero bearing on the President’s being a defender of faith and freedom to worship.

    Cheap shot.

  2. As I understand Christianity, man is not perfect nor perfectible. That is why redemption is such an important concept. As we are all flawed, past transgressions by Donald Trump or the author are irrelevant to the topic discussed. Please save your virtue signaling for those who care.

  3. Most decent people feel that all humans are, in some deep way, equal. A truly religious person however knows that the true way in which we are all equal is in God’s eyes and in God’s love, and only in that way – which is the most important way. Leftists, in contrast, live in worldly illusion and try to brutally force the never-attainable sisyphean goal of everyone being equally politically, economically, in health outcomes, in representation on TV shows and boards of directors, etc.

    Truly religious people know that there are matters that are important besides worldly things, and hold politics, power, and economics with more of a loose grip. Many leftists live in a more impoverished world, without the Transcendent, though, and therefore grip suffocatingly and aggressively tightly to all issues of politics, power, and economics.

    Truly religious people know that sometimes chasing worldly pleasures can sometimes get in the way of one’s ability to deeply commune with God, and so it is sometimes best to prioritize the second over the first. Many leftists however grip tightly to their wordly pleasures and lash out aggressively at anyone who attempts to moderate them.