In 1969 Frank Sinatra recorded a song that became an instant classic. The title was, “The Best Is Yet to Come.” The lyrics, originally written by Carol Leigh and composed by Cy Coleman in 1959, went like this:
Out of the tree of life I just picked me a plum;
You came along, and everything started to hum;
Still it’s a real good bet;
The best is yet to come.
Best is yet to come, and babe won’t that be fine;
You think you’ve seen the sun;
But you ain’t seen it shine.
Historically, “best” has been used to say that good things have happened, but that even better things will happen in the future. Life is good now, but the best is yet to come.
The latest Trump 2020 trailer was just released. It plays on the same theme.
It is part of the American saga and mentality to believe in our future. America’s Founders did. Lincoln did. So did both Roosevelts. Kennedy projected it and Reagan embodied it. Now Trump has picked up on the same positive narrative. Making and keeping America great is more than a tagline or a phrase on a red hat.
It is who we are, eternal optimists.
Think about American exceptionalism—it is the precise opposite of the managed decline and end of America thesis that the Democrats are preaching and the foreign socialist ideology they have imported.
American exceptionalism is the view that the United States occupies a special role among the nations of the world in terms of its national ethos; political, economic, and religious institutions; and its having been built by settlers. Belief in American exceptionalism has long been characteristic of both conservatives and liberals. The radical Marxist Howard Zinn, a precursor to Bernie Sanders, however, said that it is based on a myth, and that “there is a growing refusal to accept” the idea of exceptionalism both nationally and internationally. But he’s dead wrong.
Many intellectuals, across disciplines, have argued that to deny American exceptionalism is in essence to deny the heart and soul of this nation.
Because America lacks a feudal tradition of landed estates with inherited nobility, it is arguably unique among nations. The Puritan Calvinists who first came to Massachusetts had a strong belief in predestination and a theology of divine providence that still has effects down to this day. Since God made a covenant with his “chosen people,” Americans are seen as of a different type. This “city on a hill” mentality is evidenced in American folklore, song, and customs, such as Woody Guthrie’s 1944 anthem “This Land Is Your Land.” With its particular attention to legal immigration, America has been a beacon to the world for generations.
The Statue of Liberty itself is an embodiment of that ethos. America also was created on a vast frontier where rugged and untamed conditions gave birth to the American national identity and the narrative of a continent of exceptional people—explorers and adventurers. Think of my relative Teddy Roosevelt on winning the West!
The economics of the American Founding was very much a Lockean affair: the protection of property rights in what was “the largest contiguous area of free trade in the world.” But you recall there were two competing views of America’s economy: a Southern agrarian view, championed by Jefferson, and a Northern industrial or commercial view, championed by Hamilton. It is this same difference in visions that was at the economic root of the American Civil War, a war that saw the ultimate industrial and commercial view victorious.
Hamilton, as secretary of the treasury, prevailed. He established the credit of the United States by consolidating state and national debt and paying the interest on it and transforming it into capital by issuing certificates on it. He established a national banking system and thereby encouraged what he called “the spirit of enterprise.” Hamilton used the freedoms of the Constitution and its protections to create a capitalistic, free-market economy and ensured that the United States would “become the richest, most powerful, and freest country the world has ever known.”
The role of the government in such an economy was well described by James Madison in Federalist 10:
A republic . . . promises the cure for which we are seeking . . . the same advantage, which a republic has over a democracy in controlling the effects of faction, is enjoyed by a large over a small republic.
To be a fit participant in a modern republic and market society, like America, it is necessary first to be a certain kind of person in a particular kind of culture. This kind of person is one who internalizes his or her values and makes them work: a person of virtuous character. It is no accident that Max Weber identified none other than Benjamin Franklin as the epitome of the “Protestant work ethic.” Nor is it an accident that America remains the most philanthropic country in the world. Franklin was the quintessential American, an entrepreneur in every sense of the word and a proponent both of thrift as a virtue and generosity as a practice.
Finally, as Nobel Prize-winning author, V. S. Naipaul has put it,
the idea of the pursuit of happiness . . . is an elastic idea; it fits all men. It implies a certain kind of society, a certain kind of awakened spirit. I don’t imagine my father’s Hindu parents would have been able to understand the idea. So much is contained in it: the idea of the individual, responsibility, and choice, the life of the intellect, the idea of vocation and perfectibility and achievement. It is an immense human idea. It cannot be reduced to a fixed system. It cannot generate fanaticism. But it is known to exist; and because of that, other more rigid systems in the end blow away.
One does not impose personal autonomy, and that is the secret of America’s real and lasting power.
Human flourishing is an American moral theory that links virtue and happiness, specifying the relation between these two concepts as one of the central preoccupations of ethics. Virtue ethics today has been revived, and largely on account of the American spiritual capital built up as a legacy over many centuries of eudemonic thinking and practice.
American exceptionalism is the very embodiment or the exemplar of the logic of modernity.
In Reagan’s famous words, “The United States remains the last best hope for a mankind plagued by tyranny.” And, to the extent that the logic of modernity is rooted in Judeo-Christian spiritual capital, America is unique in preserving that connection.
Americans continue to identify themselves overwhelmingly with the Judeo-Christian spiritual heritage, long after it has disappeared as the cultural foundation of western Europe. That is why most Americans subscribe to the Lockean liberty narrative, not the social-democratic equality narrative that now dominates Europe; it is why America can combine a secular civil association with a religious culture instead of the belief in a theocracy; it is why America celebrates autonomy instead of the Asian belief in social conformity.
Early American settlers gave voice to a specifically Anglo-Protestant identity (yes, I am a WASP). As Harvard scholar Samuel Huntington has argued, American identity has had two primary components: culture and creed. The creed is a set of universal principles articulated in our founding documents: liberty, equality, democracy, constitutionalism, limited government, and private property.
Our culture is Anglo-Protestant, specifically, dissenting Protestantism. Moreover, the creed is itself the product of “English traditions, dissenting Protestantism, and Enlightenment ideas of the 18th-century settlers.”
One way of characterizing the early United States is to say that it inherited the logic of modernity and all of its institutions: The technological project of Francis Bacon, the idea of economic freedom from Adam Smith, political freedom from John Locke, and legal freedom (or the common law) from Great Britain.
What distinguished the United States from England were three crucial features. First, the lack of a feudal class structure, which dominated Great Britain down into the 20th century (yes, we all love “Downton Abbey,” but . . .). Second, extensive virgin territory for applying it (the Louisiana Purchase). And, finally and most especially, the opportunity for a multitude of dissenting Protestant sects, Catholics, and Jews to engage the new world with a religious fervor largely absent from the feudalistic state churches of Europe. It is important to remember how many of the original settlers were from dissenting Protestant sects, such as the Puritans, Methodists, Baptists, and Quakers.
This early influence can be seen in the sermons preached during the American War of Independence, the Declaration of Independence, and throughout the rest of U.S. history. Here is a brief sampling.
- In the Mayflower Compact (1620), “In the name of God, amen . . . having undertaken, for the glory of God, and the advancement of the Christian faith . . . a voyage to plant the first colony . . .”
- The Declaration of Independence asserts that “all men . . . are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” The last sentence asserts “a firm reliance on divine Providence.”
- The Liberty Bell contains a verse from the Torah: “Proclaim liberty throughout the land.”
- George Washington’s 1790 letter to the Hebrew Congregation at Newport: “May the children of the stock of Abraham who dwell in this land continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other inhabitants— while everyone shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree and there shall be none to make him afraid. May the father of all mercies scatter light, and not darkness, upon our paths, and make us all in our several vocations useful here, and in His own due time and way everlastingly happy.”
- John Adams said, “Statesmen . . . may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand.”
In his classic Democracy in America (1840), Tocqueville identified America’s unique religious heritage derived primarily from the Puritans, the importance of the Hebrew Bible, the transposed belief that America was a chosen nation whose founding gave Americans a sense of moral mission.
Most especially, Tocqueville observed that the biblical outlook gave America a moral dimension, which the Old World lacked. “I have said enough to put the character of Anglo-American civilization in its true light,” he wrote. “It is the result (and this should be constantly kept in mind) of two distinct elements, which in other places have been in frequent disagreement, but which the Americans have succeeded in incorporating to some extent one with the other and combining admirably. I allude to the spirit of religion and the spirit of liberty.”
Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address concludes with: “We here highly resolve . . . that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”
In 1952, President-Elect Dwight Eisenhower acknowledged that the “Judeo-Christian concept” is the “deeply religious faith” on which “our sense of government . . . is founded.” “Under God” was added to the pledge of allegiance in 1954. The national motto (since 1956), which appears on U.S. currency, is “In God We Trust.” Presidents take the oath of office on both an Old and New Testament Bible.
America exemplifies the logic of modernity par excellence. That is why there is such a thing as the American dream—which continues to draw people to our exceptional shores from the world over. It is why Donald Trump is president and why he will win reelection.