When President Trump recently announced new tariffs of $50-60 billion on Chinese exports, to punish China for stealing U.S. intellectual property and coercing U.S. companies into revealing their technological secrets, the media’s reaction was, to say the least, negative. The reaction to Trump’s tariffs designed to protect U.S. steel and aluminum producers from unfair foreign competition was no better.
A sampling of headlines underscores and highlights the point: “Trump Tariffs Undermine Trust . . . ,” “Trump Tariffs on Chinese Imports Could Raise Prices for Shoppers,” “Trump’s Trade War is Stupid, and It’s Bad News for Virtually Everyone in the U.S.,” “Trump’s China Tariffs Risk ‘Tit-for-Tat Protectionism’ That Threatens World Economy,” “China Slams Trump’s ‘Reckless’ and ‘Arrogant’ Tariffs, Warns of Retaliation,” “Trump Tariffs . . . Could Make Your Next Phone or Laptop Cost More,” “5 Reasons Trump’s Steel and Aluminum Tariffs Are Stupid,” “Trump’s Tariffs Won’t Protect U.S. Jobs, But They May Start a Trade War,” “’Straight-Up Stupid’, ‘Incompetent’, and ‘Misguided’: Economist . . . Rips Trump’s Tariffs,” “More Pain is Coming from Trump’s Tariffs,” “EU Official’s Response to Trump’s Tariffs: ‘We Can Also Do Stupid,’” “Imposing Tariffs is Stupid Policy,” “Trump Orders Huge Tariffs . . . Raises Trade War Worries,” “Trump’s Idiotic Trade War is Tanking the Stock Market,” “Larry Summers: Trump’s Tariffs ‘Crazy, Dumb.’”
As you can see, if there’s a theme here, it’s that Trump’s tariffs are not merely unwise—they are destructive and foolish. Even a dunce, we are told, could see that Trump’s policies could not possibly lead to anything good.
Well, at the risk of exposing myself as a dunce, I would draw the reader’s attention to some important new developments that prove Trump’s instincts as a businessman and a negotiator were, in fact, spot on.
First, China did announce retaliatory measures. They were feeble, by all accounts. Trump is proposing to slap tariffs on Chinese exports that will add $50-60 billion to their costs (the value was calculated based on the losses that American companies face because of abusive Chinese trade practices). The Chinese, in reply, are proposing to target $3 billion in U.S. exports with tariffs of 15-25 percent—implying an aggregate value to their tariffs of less than $1 billion. Does this sound like the clarion call of an earth-shattering trade war to you? On the contrary, it sounds as if the Chinese are thoroughly spooked.
The Chinese also indicated—contrary to the headlines above—they agree with the premise of President Trump’s sanctions. They agree that their market is closed to many U.S. goods and that major changes would be necessary in Chinese trade policies to enhance their fairness, transparency, and openness to foreign competition.
“With regard to trade imbalances, China and the United States should adopt a pragmatic and rational attitude, promote balancing [i.e. reduction of the U.S. trade deficit] through expansion of trade, and stick to negotiations to resolve differences and friction,” said Chinese Premier Li Keqiang. While hardly endorsing Trump’s tariffs, the Chinese clearly are signaling their openness to further talks, and they have already demonstrated, by previous concessions, a willingness to meet the United States halfway.
There is, however, a much bigger sign that Trump’s forceful trade strategy is paying dividends. The United States and South Korea on Tuesday announced a revision of their free-trade deal (the one President Trump had threatened to cancel), and it involves major South Korean concessions. South Korean steel exports will be cut 30 percent, and U.S. access to the South Korean auto market will expand. This should go a long way to closing the $17 billion trade gap between us while expanding opportunities for American workers—which is precisely what President Trump was elected to do.
Far from causing a breakdown in U.S.-South Korean relations, Trump’s hardball tactics have resulted in meaningful progress, and will likely produce greater prosperity for the American people.
All along, the key assumption made by the media on trade—that any policy that confronts bad actors overseas with their unfair trade practices will produce conflict and economic cataclysm—has proven to be false. For years, in fact, establishment politicians, corporate leaders, and journalists have been so committed to the shibboleth of supposed “free trade,” to internationalism, and to politically correct platitudes, that they refuse to question the fairness and rationality of existing trade deals and relationships, even while record trade deficits bleed many factory towns white.
President Trump is proving that the establishment’s scaremongering is baseless, and that standing up for American workers, and for U.S. economic interests, is not only possible—it works.
It’s too bad we didn’t learn this lesson sooner.
Photo credit: Fred Dufour/AFP/Getty Images
I don’t know why liberals always negotiate out of fear. We are the global super power. Act like it! The left never wants to upset anyone, and wet their beds at night worrying about wars.
Trump has exposed those unfair trade practices especially by Chinese…their only option is to ‘re negotiate
As Dr. Navarro recently stated, US trade representatives have been ‘negotiating’ with China since 2001 without the slightest actual change in China’s trading behaviors. The Chinese ‘retaliatory’ measures are face-saving. The Chinese understand that the health of their economy depends upon access to the US market and will adjust to virtually any set of conditions that allow them some access to the US market. Since the EU is pretty well-protected, where can all of China’s manufacturing production go? Africa? South America? Russia? China needs us more than we need them, at least at this time.
The problem with your article Mr. Waddy, is you assume the cheerleaders(The ugliest squad ever assembled btw) of Globalization 4.5 would ever care about bled white factory towns.