The Space Race: Savants of Human Space Exploration

Commercial and military space exploitation never want for a motive. Like the bronze and silver lower classes of Plato’s Republic, most space exploitation thrives on common motives of profit and security. But human space exploration, like the gold class of Plato’s Republic, requires a higher impulse: the desire to know. align=”right” Part one of a two-part series.

The great problem of space exploration is the limits of chemical energy. Until this problem is solved—with a nuclear rocket or space elevator—the equation between the mass you want to lift and the fuel you need to lift it with will continue to expand geometrically.

To address this, for commercial and military space exploitation, engineering investment tends toward miniaturization. Research dollars are better spent reducing the size and weight of the payloads than on increasing size and power of rockets. Inconveniently, these rules do not apply to human space exploration. Human beings cannot be miniaturized, and human space exploration requires the development of larger and more spectacular rockets.

The two great savants of human spaceflight of the past are Sergei Korolev and Wernher von Braun. Sergei Korolev was a Soviet Russian engineer. Not merely a brilliant engineer, Korolev was a managerial and political genius. Korolev used this genius to steer the Soviet Union into leadership in human space exploration in spite of itself.

The first Soviet hydrogen bomb capable of delivery on an intercontinental ballistic missile weighed six tons. To meet the demands of hurling this mass to another continent, Korolev’s design bureau manufactured an over-built liquid oxygen and kerosene rocket. Delivered in 1957, the rocket consisted of a central core, powered by one main turbo pump and four main combustion chambers, and four strap-on boosters, each also powered by one main turbo pump and four chambers. Designated the R-7, the missile would launch from an above ground pad constructed in the open at Baikonur Cosmodrome, in Kazakhstan in a configuration still used today.

The Russian Soyuz TMA-15 rocket.

Almost certainly it was Korolev’s intention that the R-7 would be more than meets the eye. It had far more potential lifting capacity than the six tons required and would serve as an excellent base platform for human space exploration. The R-7—with several series of modifications and improvements none of which altered its basic design—launched Sputnik, the first dog in space, the first man in space, the first woman in space, the Soviet unmanned missions to Mars, Venus, and the moon, and ferried cosmonauts to low earth orbit (LEO) space stations Salyut and Mir. It remains in service today—with over 1,700 cumulative launches—as the unparalleled workhorse of LEO. Its direct descendant, Suyoz is the only remaining means of manned travel to the International Space Station.

German rocket pioneer Wernher von Braun likewise began dreaming about human space exploration. The development of rockets required enormous capital outlays and von Braun found his willing backer in Nazi Germany, which provided the enormous facility at Peenemunde for the development and production of the V-2 rocket.

At the end of the war, von Braun was captured by the Americans, and under Operation Paperclip von Braun, along with other lesser German engineers, was shipped to the Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama to develop ballistic missiles. In 1958, after Sputnik flew on a modified R-7 rocket, the United States formed a dedicated civilian space exploration agency, NASA, to compete with Soviet space exploration.

Von Braun had promoted human space exploration in published writings starting in 1950 and was the logical candidate for director of NASA in 1960, a position he took on the condition that he be permitted to develop Saturn. When Kennedy endorsed the goal of placing a man on the moon within a decade, the president was merely parroting the ideas that von Braun’s remarkable managerial and political abilities had planted in his adopted country, giving birth to the program that would build the heavy-lift rocket, capable of placing 310,000 pounds into low-earth orbit, that would deliver six manned moon landings.

After the moon landings, the American public would lose interest in space exploration beyond LEO, and after three decades (from 1981-2011) the United States, mired in an unending series of insurgent wars, would abandon all serious will for human space exploration, retiring the inspired—but ultimately flawed—Space Shuttle without a replacement program, thus ceding a monopoly on manned space flight to Russia. Without a visionary who could manipulate the state to spend the enormous amounts of capital needed for human space exploration, U.S. space exploration simply died, as human space exploration gave way to the horribly confused priorities of identity politics under Barack Obama.

Photo credits: Oxford Science Archive/Print Collector/Getty Images (Top); Dmitry Kostyukov/AFP/Getty Images (Middle)

Support Free & Independent Journalism Your support helps protect our independence so that American Greatness can keep delivering top-quality, independent journalism that's free to everyone. Every contribution, however big or small, helps secure our future. If you can, please consider a recurring monthly donation.

Want news updates?

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

One response to “The Space Race: Savants of Human Space Exploration”

  1. wow you spew BS like it was gold or something.

    ” retiring the inspired—but ultimately flawed—Space Shuttle without a replacement program, thus ceding a monopoly on manned space flight to Russia. ”

    President Bush called for the retirement of the space shuttle in his new policy “The Vision of Space Exploration” in Jan 2004: That called for ending the space shuttle in Sept 2010. President Obama had to fight the republicans to get additional funding for two more flights.

    The Vision for Space Exploration DID call for a replacement program it ended up being called the Constellation program. For each year this program existed it added a additional year to the schedule. By the time President Obama was in office the program was YEARS behind schedule and BILLIONS over budget.

    Congress VOTED to end funding for the Constellation program and sent that bill to President Obama and he signed it.

    President Clinton signed a bill “The Commercial Space Act of 1998” it called on NASA to aquire commercial cargo and crew services to the ISS (International Space Station) but that was ignored until the second space shuttle accident and President Bush then used in the Vision for Space Exploration. But the porkonauts in congress would not fund both .. they only funded commercial cargo through the COTS program. This was a WILD SUCCESS for NASA and as NASA’s own internal study showed it only cost 1/10 as much if NASA has used the traditional cost plus fixed fee sole source FAR contracting. Republicans led by Senator Shelby TRIED to make this program cost plus but failed.

    Although the Vision for Space Exploration called for Commercial crew republicans refused to fund it. But finally under President Obama some funding was put towards commercial crew; BUT republicans undercut EVERY REQUEST in order that commercial crew would NOT be completed as fast as commercial cargo .. It would make NASA and the republicans look bad if President Obama got to launch .. the public record is clear .. republicans stopped America in its tracks for having our own launch capabilities..

    Now Mr. Wise .. explain to me how republicans voting down EVERY proposal and DELAYING the commercial crew program for YEARS and forcing us to buy from the russians was good policy?