Trump is Not to Blame for the Downfall of the California GOP

By | 2017-06-02T18:30:05+00:00 January 23, 2018|
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

As a lifelong Californian, there are few political lies more infuriating to me than the suggestion, repeated recently in the New York Times, that President Trump is somehow at fault for the decline of the California Republican Party.

The story goes something like this: Because Trump is tough on immigration, he has made Republicans even more unpopular in the Golden State, because the large Latino population allegedly cannot abide restrictions on illegal immigration. The recently announced retirements of long-time Republican congressmen Ed Royce and Darrell Issa underscores the Times’s claim.

If only it were so simple. Republicans in California have been on the decline for the better part of 25 years. In 1994, Republican Governor Pete Wilson championed Proposition 187, a ballot measure that sought to bar illegal aliens from receiving public services such as education and healthcare. Although the initiative passed with almost 59 percent of the vote, it was undone by legal challenges. A left-wing federal judge eventually struck down the law, ruling that enforcing immigration laws was the federal government’s responsibility.

Majorities of every ethnic group in California supported Prop. 187—except Latinos. California’s Democrats saw the messaging potential in the aftermath of that divisive campaign. As the effects of President Reagan’s amnesty in 1986 combined with the strength of the state’s agricultural labor market (which drew thousands of new immigrant laborers), Democrats knew that turning Latinos against Republicans would pay off in the long run.

And it did. A study by the Field Institute shows a clear drop in Latino support for California Republicans after 1994. Republican Governor George Deukmejian received 46 percent of the Latino vote in his 1986 reelection campaign. Wilson got 47 percent of the Latino vote in 1990. That number plunged to less than 25 percent in 1994—about the same number that supported Prop. 187. Since then, the Republican share of the Latino vote in California has never risen above 30 percent, with the sole exception of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s re-election in 2006, when he drew roughly 39 percent.

Schwarzenegger’s disappointing tenure as governor was born out of the post-Prop. 187 mindset that the rightward drift of the party (especially, but not limited to immigration) was to blame for Republicans’ waning fortunes statewide. State party leaders and their donors concluded that a hardline position on anything was a loser, and so a great rush to the center began.

Schwarzenegger blurred the lines between Democrats and Republicans as he raised taxes, supported same-sex marriage, and gave the state government nearly unlimited power to regulate the energy market to reduce carbon emissions. Despite initial Republican opposition to some of his more left-wing policies, Schwarzenegger’s landslide reelection in 2006 seemed to vindicate his moderate approach, and was directly responsible for the moderation of the party as a whole.

The result speaks for itself. The most recent GOP gubernatorial nominee was Neel Kashkari, an Illinois native and now president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. He ran in 2014 as “a different kind of Republican,” which is to say, not much of a Republican at all. He was pro-same sex marriage, pro-amnesty, pro-abortion, pro-gun control, supported government regulations on carbon emissions, and, incidentally, voted for Barack Obama in 2008 over John McCain. Jerry Brown crushed him by 19 points. Brown had a bit more of a challenge in 2010 with former eBay CEO Meg Whitman, who ran as a Schwarzenegger clone. She lost by just 11 points. Whitman has gone on to establish herself as an outspoken anti-Trump Republican. She endorsed and donated to Hillary Clinton’s campaign while comparing Donald Trump to Hitler and Mussolini.

Other moderates in the state party have hurt its standing in the legislature as well. Former Assemblywoman Ling Ling Chang lost a state senate election in 2016, in a reliably red district, because she had voted for several anti-gun bills. This led to the Democrats regaining a two-thirds “supermajority” in that chamber.

Former Assembly Minority Leader Chad Mayes led eight Republican legislators in 2017 to vote with the Democrats for a bill to extend the state’s “cap-and-trade” program, which sets limits on greenhouse gas emissions and allows “polluters” to buy special licenses from the state. Mayes was forced to resign after over 20 county central committees and the state party’s board all called on him to step down.

Now, Schwarzenegger and Mayes have formed a new organization called “New Way California” with the idea of making the party even more moderate. Chang is considered a potential candidate for Royce’s seat, while one of the eight Republicans who voted for cap-and-trade—Assemblyman Rocky Chavez of Oceanside—is running for Issa’s seat, with Schwarzenegger’s endorsement. Chavez told the New York Times he would not have voted for last year’s historic tax reform bill.

And yet Schwarzenegger, Mayes, and the Times would have you believe that Trump is to blame for the state party’s implosion. Bill Whalen, a former aide to Pete Wilson who has remained staunchly loyal to his former boss, told the Times that the California GOP’s real problem is having to defend Trump’s positions.

But Trump’s polarizing presidency doesn’t explain the fact that the party’s registration numbers in the Golden State have plummeted from 37.2 percent in 1994 to 25.9 percent. Democrats, meanwhile, have 44.8 percent of registered voters. Trump’s presidency cannot explain why not one Republican has won a statewide contest since 2006. Trump’s existence does not explain why Republicans were completely shut out of the 2016 California U.S. Senate race. Under the state’s insipid top-two primary law—a moderate Republican-backed initiative, by the way—two Democrats faced off in the general election. Trump won’t be at fault, either, if and when the Republicans are excluded from this year’s gubernatorial race.

And never mind the fact that not a single House Republican in California lost their seat in 2016—the one year that was most ripe for a Republican reckoning over Trump’s candidacy. Even Republicans in districts that voted for Hillary Clinton—such as David Valadao in Kern County, Steve Knight in the Antelope Valley north of Los Angeles, Darrell Issa in north San Diego County, and Jeff Denham in Modesto—all survived their reelection bids with relative ease. Where was this “Trump effect” then?

No, pay no mind to such bothersome facts. Moderate Republicans and their fair-weather fans in the mainstream press would rather peddle the tale that Trump, who launched his presidential campaign in mid-2015, is to blame for 24 years of Republican folly. Right. As the future president said in his cameo appearance on Fresh Prince of Bel-Air: “Everybody’s always blaming me for everything.”

Only state Republican Party Chairman Jim Brulte gets it right. Brulte rejects the narrative that Trump’s presidency is pushing “a party already struggling closer to the brink.” “Republicans lost every statewide race in California in 2002, 2010 and 2014, before Donald Trump even announced he was running for president,” he told the Times. Anyone arguing otherwise, Brulte added, is “a revisionist historian.”

California Republicans, with very few exceptions, never seem to learn from their mistakes. The rhetoric surrounding Proposition 187 may have been a blunder, but it needn’t have been fatal. Republicans instead decided to moderate themselves into irrelevance. The result now is that statewide elections are no longer referendums on Democrats versus Republicans, but moderate-Left Democrats versus hard-Left Democrats. Why bother with ersatz Democrat Republicans when Californians can choose the real thing?

Trump’s presidency is an opportunity for the Republicans to reinvigorate themselves. California’s pale-pastel Republicans seem intent repeating the same old mistakes.  

About the Author:

Eric Lendrum
Eric Lendrum is a weekly contributor for The Millennial Review, and an occasional contributor for Shield Society. A graduate of the University of California, Santa Barbara, he was the Secretary of the College Republicans and the founding chairman of the school's Young Americans for Freedom chapter. He has worked on several campaigns, including Congressman David Valadao (CA-21), California State Senator Andy Vidak (SD-14), and Santa Barbara City Councilman Frank Hotchkiss. More recently, he has interned for Young America's Foundation and the Heritage Foundation.
Loading...

11 Comments

  1. kalendjay January 23, 2018 at 5:15 pm

    About that jungle primary, as it is called, which is referred to as part of the GOP’s demise.

    I suggest it is unconstitutional, as it has a pattern of violating freedom of assembly — after all, we expect our parties, as well as our 501(c) organizations, to organize and attract like minded patrons to express a particular view, and implement that view in public law or public activity. You cannot expect Republicans to freely assemble when encouragement by the opposing party creates internecine warfare to pick off the candidates, and then cause the base to vote Democratic (or join Democrats to influence primaries) in order to choose the lesser of two evils.

    Our Constitution guarantees the States a republican form of government. The matter was often raised during Reconstruction to justify federal intervention in the affairs of former Confederate states.

    If a referendum were held to repeal the jungle primary, you can bet either a liberal judge or the Berkeley mob would defeat it. And you can expect further attacks on the GOP nationwide, in the form of ending Gerrymandering.

    What are your thoughts, Eric?

    • Debra January 24, 2018 at 2:26 am

      Gℴℴgle paying to people of every age 98 dollars per/hr to do some small tasks onnet .. Do job for few time & spend greater time together with your own family … Anyone can catch online jobs plan…last Wednesday I bought a great new McLaren F1 after I been earning $6876 this six weeks .it sounds the coolest job but you could now not forgive yourself if you do not go to this.!cx082k:➥➥➥ http://GoogleOnlineUpNetJobsOpportunity/simple/work ♥♥s♥j♥p♥♥n♥o♥♥v♥j♥♥♥o♥♥h♥♥y♥♥♥n♥♥e♥s♥u♥u♥♥d♥v♥♥♥r♥♥k♥u♥♥♥h♥♥h♥♥♥o♥f♥♥j:::::!px303s:lhuh

  2. SmartProf January 24, 2018 at 5:20 am

    Prop 187 passed by overwhelming majorities.
    Usually a political party is smart to back something that wins such support.

    The problem was the judge, not the Prop.

  3. joinamerica January 24, 2018 at 7:44 am

    Mr. Lendrum, you are 100% correct.

  4. Joanne January 24, 2018 at 8:36 am

    “Why bother with ersatz Democrat Republicans when Californians can choose the real thing?” Choosing Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina during the Tea Party revolution of 2010. Totally demoralized GOP voters. After the GOP primary, I contacted the office in my area to volunteer; crickets.

    Saying they’re worthless is being kind.

  5. zoomie January 24, 2018 at 9:41 am

    Another , perhaps more basic analysis of commiefornia politics.

    If you don’t like your voters, import ones who will vote for you.
    Pay the imports from money stolen from the ones you want to get rid of.

    It worked so well in commifornia, the party of “ progressives “ will shut down the national government to make sure they can do the same thing for the whole country.

    Any questions ?

  6. Mike D'Virgilio January 24, 2018 at 9:44 am

    I have to tell you this was coming long before Prop. 187. I worked on Congressman B-1 Bob Dornan’s reelection in 1984 (that’s when Orange County was actually conservative). Even then there was an inter-Republican Party war between the enlightened moderates who just knew that those wacky, extremists social conservatives were going to destroy the Republican Party in California. I went to the party annual convention, and I was shocked at the hatred for all things conservative I found, most especially social conservative. I remember talking to his wife, Sallie, and telling her my concern, and how I couldn’t believe the vitriol. She told me not to worry, that the moderates would never win. Oh, they’ve won alright, and completely destroyed the Republican Party in the process. And they still think the answer is to double down on moderate. Amazing. They’ve helped destroy my once great home state, where I would never choose to live again. I’m a Floridian now, and love it. My family’s votes now actually count!

  7. Frank Natoli January 24, 2018 at 1:28 pm

    It’s probably true that most California Republicans are white, meaning not of Spanish ancestry, but it’s probably false the most California whites are Republicans. Fact is, California incubates big government everybodies, whites, blacks, browns, yellows, red, choose your color. That would not really matter if we still had a federal system, where Californians could commit economic, societal and cultural suicide without affecting everybody else.
    But we don’t.

  8. Dyllin Barnett-Lozano January 24, 2018 at 11:33 pm

    In our CA county the problem is that the Repub Central Committee and the Party Chair are simply morally corrupt!

  9. Laurel January 25, 2018 at 7:27 am

    The Feds ought to use the Prop. 187 ruling to hang around California’s neck in regards to immigration enforcement.

  10. Al Hanamay January 30, 2018 at 12:19 pm

    I seem to be the only 1 who doesn’t skirt around THE REAL CAUSE. To say that GOP lost face for standing for law & order in 1994 , is a joke Does that make sense to anyone?
    LINDSEY GRAHAM LOST US CALIFORNIA

    He was the primary culprit in the failure of the Clinton impeachment.

    Yes, you guessed it.His agenda & approach dominated, such that the GOP ended up looking like bedroom snoopers in the Lewinsky case

    Instead of exposing Clintons sexual maladjustments, Graham refused to make the case based on all of Clinton’s transgressions combined. He was responsible for the GOP emerging as bedroom snoopers ,despite having a slam dunk case vs Clinton..

    Graham was resp for eliminating the cases of Kathleen Willey,Juanita Broaderick,Paula Jones from the prosecution
    After that you had many calif independents vowing to never vote GOP again..I’ve talked to a couple of them. so the GOP ‘s loss of the Calif vote is now being placed in RETRO on our support of …ready ? Of Prop 187
    –an issue that was solely responsible for Pete Wilson’s ’94 victory !!

    Pete turned around a 30 point deficit w/ a campaign based 100 % on illegal immigration, which his opponent kathleen Brown YES BROWN, was opposed to. Pete won by 14 pts ,comprising a 44 point SWING from his 30 point deficit .

    But we’re told that illegal immigration from 1994 was the reason Dems were swept into all the elected offices in 1998. .
    YOU THINK IT’S NOT CRUCIAL TO ESTAB EXACTLY WHAT CAUSED OUR LOSS OF ALL OFFICES IN ’98.?We’re talking 55 electorals
    GOP leader Chas Munger is right now pushing for GOP to drop abortion & illegal immigration as platform issues

Comments are closed.