No, America’s Farmers Don’t Depend on Illegal Immigration

By | 2017-06-02T18:30:05+00:00 January 13, 2018|
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Liberals frame the debate over illegal immigration as a dilemma: either America grants amnesty to aliens or the economy will collapse. Some even imply that Americans will starve to death because of higher food prices—who would pick America’s fruits and veggies if not illegals?

Bruce Goldstein, president of a nonprofit called Farmworker Justice, boldly claims that “if we were to [deport all illegal aliens], our agricultural system would collapse.” Collapse.

This is nonsense. American agriculture won’t collapse without illegal labor. Why not? Because there are plenty of technological solutions, and American workers available to pick up the slack. It’s time we put this myth to bed.

Here are the facts.

First, agriculture is not a labor-intensive industry, and it hasn’t been for decades. Less than 2 percent of Americans work in agriculture, according to data from the World Bank. That number has been on the decline since 1960, when roughly 6 percent of Americans worked on farms. If trends continue, we could expect the number to continue to decline. Thanks to the wonders of mechanization, machines now do everything from threshing wheat to milking cows. The bottom line: most farmers do not “benefit” from cheap illegal labor, since their labor costs are minimal to begin with.

The “exception” to this rule are fruit and nut farms, located primarily in California. Crops like raspberries and almonds are notoriously difficult for machines to pick. There are many reasons for this including the fact that berries require a “soft touch,” they ripen at different times, and bushes are tough for machinery to navigate. These labor-intensive farms are the main agricultural culprits when it comes to hiring illegal workers—after all, they have the most to gain.

But even labor-intensive agriculture doesn’t depend upon illegal labor—that’s just icing on the cake. In reality, the industry could get by without illegal workers since only 4 percent of American agricultural workers are illegal aliens, according to a report in National Review. Likewise, only 1 in 6 workers in California’s nut orchards are in the country illegally. Removing illegals from the system would be inconvenient for orchards, but it wouldn’t drive them out of business—the remaining employees would simply have to work a few hours of overtime per day.

Without Illegal Aliens, Who Will Pick the Crops?
There are two ways for the agriculture industry to replace illegal workers: they could either hire Americans or invest in better technology.

At this moment, roughly 23 million Americans are unemployed. Some of them have experience in agriculture. On top of this, America has a massive problem with seasonal unemployment for its college students. Either way, there are more than enough Americans to fill a potential farm labor shortage. The only reason Americans are not working in agriculture is that they cannot compete with cheap illegal workers. If you read this document published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, you will find that millions of Americans—of all races—currently work as janitors, laborers, and agricultural workers. If farmers were required to pay market wages, they wouldn’t have a problem finding employees.

But without that cheap labor, won’t the cost of produce go up? Yes—but not by much. Higher labor costs can only result in higher prices to the degree that labor impacts the product’s cost. For example, higher wages for train conductors do not appreciably impact rail shipping costs because there are so few conductors per unit of freight—rail is capital-intensive. Contrast this with some retail outlets that spend 70 percent of their revenue on labor costs.

Agriculture—even fruit and nut orchards—are relatively capital-intensive. The labor costs aren’t all that significant per unit of produce. Proof is in the numbers. A 2011 report published by the Federation for American Immigration Reform found that the agriculture industry was one of America’s most profitable sectors, and could easily afford to pay its workers 20-30 percent more without significantly cutting into profits.

Further, research by Philip Martin, a leading expert on farm labor and migration issues, found that labor costs are negligible compared to the retail cost of produce. Martin in 2006 found that only 5-6 cents of every dollar spent on produce is due to labor costs. Therefore, if illegal aliens were removed from the labor force entirely, and labor costs rose by up to 40 percent to attract American workers, labor would still only account for 7-9 cents. Over the course of a year, this works out to just $9 extra for the average household. This is nothing, especially when you remember that illegal immigration costs America between $115 and $140 billion annually.

Can Technology Replace Illegal Immigrant Labor?
The second option, improving technology and embracing mechanization, is the strategy employed by America’s wheat, corn, and dairy industry. Have you ever had trouble affording flour or milk? Probably not. You can thank mechanization for this fact, not illegal aliens.

Although adopting new technology can be expensive, it brings costs down in the long run. And as it turns out, there’s a good argument to be made that the American fruit and nut industry’s addiction to cheap illegal labor has stifled technological development, and kept prices artificially high. Farmers should, and could mechanize—today. The technology exists if only America’s fruit farms would embrace it. For example, an American company called “Abundant Robotics” has developed a fruit-picking robot that can harvest apples and peaches. Other companies have developed machines that are able to pick much smaller, more delicate fruit, like grapes and strawberries.

America’s farmers don’t have to rely on illegal alien labor. This is a myth cooked up by the pro-illegal immigration lobby to further its agenda. Nothing more. I’d go so far as to argue that illegal immigration actually has no economic benefits on the whole—the gains are reaped only by special interest groups, while America pays the price. In the end, evidence must prevail over emotion: illegal immigration must stop.

About the Author:

Spencer P. Morrison
Spencer P. Morrison is a law student, writer, and author of "Bobbins, Not Gold." He is the editor-in-chief of the National Economics Editorial (https://www.nationaleconomicseditorial.com). Follow him on Twitter @SPMorrison_.
Loading...
  • Joel Mathis

    “the remaining employees would simply have to work a few hours of overtime per day.”

    Spoken like a guy who has never had to do this particular kind of work.

    • truethevote

      I did this as a high school student. It was good money. Sure it’s hot, but so is the beach and playing frisbee in the park. Once you’re there, you’re there. A few more hours for extra pay is good when you’re young. Now that I practice medicine, it’s the same thing. Extra hours, but no extra pay. No matter who you are, overtime is a bonus. .

      Have you ever done that type of work? Or are you one of those guys who speaks out when he hasn’t done this particular kind of work?

    • Eric Johnson

      I don’t see a lot of calluses on your hands either.

    • Worked in a boulder pit for 5 years. Was happy to get overtime to help pay for law school. But thanks for revealing your disdain for manual labor.

      • Joel Mathis

        I unreservedly apologize for my incorrect assumption.

        That said: Some people will want OT pay, some won’t. Asking people who do a hard job to do more of it might not work as cavalierly as you expect.

        No disdain for manual labor. Have a couple of scars of my own.

        • No harm done Joel.

          And of course you’re right, some won’t want OT. But even so, the labor market is nowhere near saturated. Ie. there are millions of Americans who would be happy to find work—they’re currently displaced by illegal workers, who undercut free market wages.

          I think there’s good evidence to suggest that if the market weren’t distorted by illegal labor, wages would rise to the level that would attract American workers. This would be good for everyone. We’ve already seen it in Texas’ construction industry, after all:

          https://www.nationaleconomicseditorial.com/2017/08/06/shortage-illegal-labor-wage-increases/

  • Eric Johnson

    Tobacco farms in North Carolina used to hire high school students to go through and harvest tobacco leaves , right before the start of the school year. Farmers did this because going through the fields with a knife and bag produced a much better crop than machinery alone.

    Kids learned that HARD WORK = MONEY IN POCKET and Farmers got a good harvest. It was a WIN – Win for everybody.

    • Exactly. Now we have—quite literally—millions of kids who’ve never worked a job a day in their life. The employment niche they’d naturally fill is flooded with illegals & temporary visa workers. They can’t catch a break.

      Even the federal government prioritizes foreign students over domestic, as I noted last year:

      https://www.nationaleconomicseditorial.com/2017/07/28/government-prioritizing-foreigners-over-american-students/

    • Lora

      Goog-l-e is payi-n-g 97$ per hour,w-i-th w-e-ekly payouts.You can also ava-i-l this.On tuesday I got a brand new Land Rover Range Rover from ha-v-ing earned $11752 this last four weeks..w-i-th-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have e-v-er done .. It so-u-nds unbelie-v-able but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it!ge061t:⇛⇛⇛ http://GoogleNetJobsMediaCashJobsOpportunity/simple/work ♥c♥m♥m♥♥♥s♥f♥♥g♥♥♥l♥♥h♥♥q♥o♥i♥s♥♥♥o♥♥♥y♥♥♥t♥♥m♥s♥j♥♥♥m♥♥m♥♥v♥♥q♥♥b♥♥♥s♥♥♥t:::::!gx501o:lwe

    • Brett baker

      Well, hopefully Trump will roll back the regs to make hiring high school kids easier.

  • BCML

    The author is wrong. Agriculture has depended on illegals for decades. So has the landscape industry and the nanny business. Just a fact.

  • Adobe_Walls

    The elitist who drop these policies on us benefit greatly from illegals, housekeeping, childcare and lawn care. They can afford to pay a little more for legal workers. If it turns out that we actually do need a million plus new immigrants a year we could always raise the caps. Whatever else we do about immigration we have to ensure that those we let stay and come in the future cannot get on public assistance.

  • JustCurious

    “Cheap” illegal labor is really taxpayer-subsidized labor. The only solution to the problem of illegal immigration is making the E-Verify system MANDATORY for all employers nationwide, and aggressive IRS-style enforcement of our employment law. Illegals come over the border (or overstay their visas) because they can find work. If they know they can’t work, most won’t come. Like street drugs, it’s a demand problem: If the demand dries up, so will the supply. So the only question that matters is: Are our politicians determined to allow their corporate employer-donors to maintain the inflow of illegal labor that benefits them at the expense of the rest of us? Given how little discussion there is among politicians about E-Verify — the one measure that would actually solve the problem, it sure seems so.

  • ata777

    You know who else was in favor of maintaining a cheap labor force with no political power to harvest crops? Slave owners.