With Dignity, Trump Crosses the Delaware

By | 2017-06-02T18:30:05+00:00 December 21, 2017|
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The tax-cut bill is the beginning of the end of the Cult of Victimization. With its passage, the Republican majority in Congress, however tenuous, has scored its first (and only) major legislative victory, handing president Trump and the American people an early Christmas present. That it was passed without a single opposition-party vote in either house should tell you all you need to know about the socialist ethos that has seized control of the criminal organization masquerading as a political party known as the Democrats.

As it happens, this gift—to all Americans, not just the “rich” and “corporations,” as the socialists would have you believe—nearly coincides with Washington’s famous surprise attack on the sleeping Hessian mercenaries in 1776. While the Democrats were not caught off-guard to quite the same extent as the frozen German soldiers, they were just as thoroughly routed, as you can tell from the bitter denunciations coming from such veteran party apparatchiks as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), along with their party mouthpieces, such as the New York Times.

Quoth Schumer: “There are only two places where America is popping champagne—the White House and the corporate board rooms, including Trump Tower.”

If not quite as sweeping and simplifying as Reagan’s tax cuts in 1981 or the reforms of 1986, the bill rectifies some of our tax code’s worst distortions, with remedies such as reducing the corporate tax rate to more internationally competitive levels and eliminating Obamacare’s individual “mandate,” which financed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (passed with zero Republican votes) at IRS gunpoint.

That these two selling points were immediately decried as “tax cuts for the wealthy” and “destroying poor people’s health care” tells you all you need to know about the poverty of the Democrats’ ideological pro forma response. But then to these people, everything is the End of the World As We Know It, including rolling back Obama’s “net neutrality,” restoring state lands in Utah, and letting you keep some more of your own money. Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut’s reaction was typical:

To which may I add: blah, blah, blah. We’ve been hearing the same Marxist boilerplate from the same yaps on the left side of the aisle for decades, ever since the young Marxists behind George McGovern’s 1972 presidential campaign (who included Bill Clinton) started flexing their political muscles. The federal government has no more right to a share of your income than I do; a government financed largely by tariffs and excise taxes, as we had before the “progressive” passage of the 16th Amendment in 1913 is far to be preferred to one that confiscates income at its source.

Failing that, real tax reform must still await the passage of a flat tax, under which everybody who earns a single dime pays at least a penny, just to have skin in the game.

And this is the key to why today’s Democrats fight tax reform so fiercely. It is not simply a question of their fondness for Marxist economic “principles,” or even a feature of the blue state model (as James Piereson noted on Wednesday) but also a means to continuing their political power through the moral diminishment of the individual.

What is more morally debilitating than to be dependent upon others for one’s food, shelter, and clothing? Having failed so signally in the economic arena, satanic Marxism took another form, especially after the collapse of the Left’s beloved Soviet Union. If the goal of classical Marxism was economic slavery disguised as the “dictatorship of the proletariat”—the Marxist passion for “dictatorship” is always unrestrained—then the object of cultural Marxism was social slavery disguised as victimization.

As I noted yesterday on Twitter:

It’s long been a puzzlement on the Right why the appeal of tax cuts has faded over the past 30 years. The reason is simple: most of the federal income taxes (as distinguished, for bookkeeping purposes, from the FICA taxes for Social Security and Medicare, although they’re in fact the same thing) are paid by “the rich.” Indeed, via something deliciously called the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITA), those who pay essentially no income taxes nevertheless get a “refund” of other people’s money. That the EITA, like Medicaid—which the Democrats have been calling “health care” and “insurance” since its expansion under Obamacare—is a welfare program is something the Democrats would prefer the taxpayers not know.

The expansion of the Welfare State has exactly coincided with the expansion of the Cult of Victimization, ascribing a positive moral good to something that is at best neutral and in some instances shameful. The cultural-Marxist imposition of “political correctness” and the Left’s ongoing attempts to police the language have taken such useful terms as “bums,” “hobos,” “derelicts,” “wastrels,” “layabouts” and “mooches” temporarily out of circulation—but watch them make a comeback as, in the currently expanding economy (4 percent growth is in sight) more and more people will begin to experience something long taught as a moral good in Christian theology: the dignity of work.

Try to take that away from them again, along with their earned income, and see what happens.

About the Author:

Michael Walsh
Michael Walsh is a journalist, author, and screenwriter. He was for 16 years the music critic of Time Magazine. His works include the novels, "As Time Goes By," "And All the Saints" (winner, 2004 American Book Award for fiction) and the “Devlin” series of thrillers; as well as the recent nonfiction bestseller, "The Devil’s Pleasure Palace." A sequel, "The Fiery Angel," is scheduled to appear in 2018. You can follow him on Twitter at @dkahanerules
Loading...

16 Comments

  1. Rightway December 21, 2017 at 12:16 pm

    Is it too late to amend the Tax Cut Bill to exclude any Member of Congress who did not vote for it?
    You know, like how the Democrat Congress exempted themselves from ObamaCare.

    • Sean December 21, 2017 at 5:51 pm

      President DJT should announce that he’s going to protect everyone from Obamacare EXCEPT Democrats in Congress.

      • Elizabeth December 22, 2017 at 5:25 am

        Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
        On tuesday I got a brand new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It Sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        !gy188d:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFileFinanceReportsOnline/online/easytasks ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!gy188lhh

      • Cybergeezer December 23, 2017 at 10:00 am

        Excellent idea!
        PRESIDENT TRUMP should nominate Maxine Waters as ObamaCare Czar.
        Have a rabid Democrat administer the punitive program that is crushing the middle class family.
        They deserve ALL the credit for their “healthcare” hoax.

  2. Walpurgis December 21, 2017 at 12:38 pm

    Is there some way you guys could fix this website?

    • Malatrope December 24, 2017 at 9:16 am

      I concur. STOP BOUNCING THE COMMENTS UP AND DOWN! It’s caused by the number of lines in the titles of the side-scrolling “Related Posts” above. Limit these titles to two lines and add an ellipses (…) if they are longer.

      The jumping is immensely annoying and easily fixed.

  3. Brett baker December 21, 2017 at 1:14 pm

    Trump should pass a “Social Security Modernization Act”. Give every American citizen a check $1 over poverty line, so no CITIZEN is in poverty. Elminate the payroll taxes and replace them with a border-adjusted value-added tax. The advantages are:
    1. Pass the RAISE Act.( we should anyway, but this is more ammo.)
    2. “We must raise income taxes to support fellow Americans.” (Not anymore.)
    3. Having eliminated the excuse of poverty, we can unleash the cops on the criminals. (Shoot to kill looters, the next time there’s a power outage.)

  4. Dansidea December 21, 2017 at 4:13 pm

    Good synopsis- the true arithmetic hypocrisy of the left to a bill like this is telling, they know it whacks their people (well off blue staters) most but they decry it as a “giveaway to the rich.” If the GOP could ever get its messaging down like the Democrats do it could be the start of something good for everyone.

    • Cybergeezer December 23, 2017 at 10:10 am

      Never happen unless the Republican Party invents and employs it’s own news media.
      Even after that, it still has to get pretty much the same public exposure.

    • Adobe_Walls December 26, 2017 at 12:04 pm

      Not so sure that even the ”Blue Staters get whacked. The last family’s situation is interesting.

      https://pjmedia.com/video/three-families-find-just-tax-bill-will-affect-merry-christmas-around/

      • Dansidea December 26, 2017 at 12:42 pm

        Agreed Adobe but rich leveraged blue staters are gonna feel it , that’s one reason the PelosiShumers are howling

  5. TboneAgain December 21, 2017 at 7:45 pm

    A Congress that can pass a tax bill that eliminates the ridiculous deductions for state and local taxes can also pass a bill that eliminates the even more ridiculous tax exemption for employer-sponsored health insurance. Both were mind-numbingly stupid acts in the first place. Both are hideous perversions of the Constitution’s requirement that taxation be equally applied to all.

    • Cybergeezer December 23, 2017 at 10:07 am

      The medical lobby is one of the most powerful in America with massive influence in Congress.
      Pair them up with government unions, and you have a match made in the Soviet model.
      These innocently disguised pre-tax benefit deductions pander to this specific political lobby.

  6. conservative_302 December 22, 2017 at 4:41 am

    Great article. Thank you for writing it. MAGA!

  7. Andy December 22, 2017 at 9:56 am

    So this is how the brainwashing works. Truly interesting. I mean, sure, every non-partisan economic analysis has said that it will cause a massive deficit increase, sustained benefits that only enrich those that are already wealthy, and actually increase taxes on the middle class in the long run, but who needs facts when you can just vilify the other side and embrace a full on plutocrat who ran as a populist.

    • Cybergeezer December 23, 2017 at 10:02 am

      With many, it’s a “quick wash”. And they like it so much they “lather, rinse, and repeat”.

Comments are closed.