Don’t Cut Taxes—Simplify the Code Instead

By | 2017-06-02T18:30:05+00:00 November 17, 2017|
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Republicans’ proposed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is the archetypical tax reform bill: it lowers taxes but increases their complexity. High taxes are bad, but a complex tax code is worse. America deserves better.

This is not to say that high taxes are not a problem. They are. America is one of the most heavily taxed jurisdictions in the developed world, and high taxes are the main reason why so many firms move their head offices out of the United States and into low-tax jurisdictions such as Canada or Ireland. The corporate inversion epidemic is made in Washington, D.C. High taxes also hurt individuals: according to the Tax Foundation, taxes cost Americans more out-of-pocket earnings than do shelter, clothing, and food combined. Tax cuts are a must.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act largely delivers on this front. The legislation would slash the corporate tax rate from 35 to 20 percent, reduce the number of individual income tax brackets, and double the basic personal deduction, which will let people shield more of their income from Uncle Sam. And perhaps most important, the bill would remove loopholes that allow illegal aliens to collect some $23 billion in tax credits annually (yes, you read that right).

Not only that, but the law would likely generate economic growth. The Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan public interest group, estimates that the Republican plan would create up to 1 million new jobs and increase GDP by 3.9 percent “over the long term.” The group also estimates the average after-tax income for a middle-income family would grow by $2,598 over the next 10 years as a direct result of the legislation. This is good news, and it is consonant with other research.

For example, a recent study from the Council of Economic Advisers found that reducing the corporate tax rate from 35 to 20 percent would increase America’s GDP by 3 to 5 percent over the coming decade. Likewise, Congress estimates that the reforms would give an ordinary middle-class family of four (earning $59,000 annually) a tax break of $1,182 per year (not including the projected economic growth), as reported by the Washington Free Beacon.

Why Congress Must Simplify the Tax Code
Yet legislators continue to miss the mark. The biggest problem with America’s tax system is complexity, not high rates.

Most people agree. According to a 2017 Gallup poll, 51 percent of Americans think they pay too much in taxes—the rest think they pay a fair amount. Although America is divided over the tax rate, everyone agrees that complexity is a problem: fully 90 percent of Americans think the tax code is too difficult for ordinary people to understand. Reducing tax complexity is something everyone agrees on, and something America desperately needs.

The Internal Revenue Code has nearly tripled in length from President Ronald Reagan’s substantive reforms in 1986 (which themselves were inadequate), and as of 2016, the code proper is 2,650 pages long—or a staggering 3.7 million words. To make matters worse, taxpayers must comply with an additional 70,000 pages of tax forms, instructions, and regulations. And on top of all that, innumerable court decisions govern the way tax legislation and regulations are interpreted—ordinary people cannot easily access or understand them.

It’s a fair bet that no American alive today—including the very best New York tax attorneys—has read every piece of relevant tax law. And even if someone has, there is no way that they can remember how everything fits together. The code is just too long and too complex.

Tax complexity hurts Americans in a number of ways. For starters, it costs money: individuals and businesses spend big bucks hiring accountants and lawyers simply to comply with the law. In fact, Americans spent an absurd $409 billion on tax compliance in 2016—a record high. This works out to roughly 7 billion wasted hours filing taxes, which is equivalent to 3.7 million people working full time for a year. This time could be better spent doing (quite literally) anything else.

The high costs associated with filing taxes also hurt America by favoring big, multinational corporations over local businesses. Think about it. Accountants and tax lawyers are very expensive, and so are the potential consequences for filing an incomplete or incorrect tax return. This puts many small businesses in a bind: either they shell out big money to tax specialists, or they risk missing out on the plethora of obscure tax deductions. If unlucky, the tax man may even pay them a visit. Either way, complexity benefits big companies who can afford to deal with said complexity relative to local businesses. Complexity is regressive.

Finally, complexity breeds corruption. The more complex the tax code, the more places there are to hide goodies for special interests and donors. For example, you can deduct up to $10,000 in taxable income for repairs to your whaling boat if you have one (and yes, whaling is illegal). Likewise, men are allowed to deduct up to $14,500 in taxable income for sex-change operations—women can probably do the same, although it has not yet been litigated. Deductions like these would not be available if the code were simpler.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is a decent stab at tax reform, but if Congress is serious about making America great again, they will need to simplify the tax code.  

About the Author:

Spencer P. Morrison
Spencer P. Morrison is a law student, writer, and author of Bobbins, Not Gold. He is the editor-in-chief of the National Economics Editorial. Follow him on Twitter @SPMorrison_.
Loading...

4 Comments

  1. tz1 November 17, 2017 at 10:31 am

    IT would be better if I could spend 5 minutes and file on a post card at the identical rate I’m paying now rather than paying my accountant $500 and spending hours even just getting the docs ready for him. I’d still save $500 and a lot of paperwork grief and pain. I’m a slave because I MUST UNDER PENALTY OF LAW spend hours organizing my paperwork.

  2. Marathon-Youth November 17, 2017 at 2:47 pm

    “but a complex tax code is worse. America deserves better…”
    That is what I thought about the 2 thousand page Obamacare. Everything Obama did ended up with some of the most complex extremely Bureaucratic, epically wordy policies and tax codes. We deserved better.

  3. Deserttrek November 18, 2017 at 10:09 am

    a flat tax for all
    one rate for the same dollars they can even graduate, dollars above a certain amount regardless of “filing status”,
    the same for businesses
    stop with the specials for special groups

  4. Vinny James November 18, 2017 at 12:40 pm

    Solid article as always sir! However economists are a joke! They are never right on “predictions” or “forecasts” on fiscal policy! When I see an economist quoted on predictions I immediately dismiss it. Their only usefulness is on the recommendation of systems. Socialism vs capitalism as an easy example. I took micro and macro economics in college… I know its useless profession! Except for the money to be made as an over paid ecnomist!
    That said Milton Friedman was one of the few good ones!

Comments are closed.