Professor Trump’s Lessons for Higher Education

By | 2017-06-02T18:30:05+00:00 September 10, 2017|
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Following some elite campus visits with his daughter, the morose father lamented that one cannot simply opt out of college. Such a defiance of convention did not seem feasible socially or economically. Like all men of sense, he is among those flabbergasted by former Princeton President Woodrow Wilson’s eagerness to make his students “as unlike their fathers as possible.”

Today’s college administrators have gone well beyond Wilson’s edict. It seems that the default position on campus today is to surrender common sense and the most obvious moral scruples, allow questionable social habits, and yield to one’s youthful passions and impulses. All this misery comes at an enormous cost to the parents.

Parents no longer can be deluded by expressions such as the “old college try.” The current successors of Woodrow Wilson are more in line with the pseudo-Socrates of Aristophanes’ Clouds—a man whom the horrified father sees as a charlatan who would gladly allow his son to rape his mother, just after the twerp has assaulted him. The dread and dismay facing parents and prospective students is the same today as it was in 4th century B.C. Athens.

Don’t kid yourself that a great reputation or even a religious affiliation will protect your son or daughter. A venerable and distinguished priest and professor, now retired, said about Georgetown University that its only guarantee is that freshmen will graduate as moral relativists. Similar debunking applies to most any university today.

The corrupting temptation of higher education, as it is of any business enterprise, is to flatter the passions of the consumers and accommodate their appetites. Such an attitude means that actual dedication to the good of the students will be subordinate to the good of the institution.

The great question remains: Who will educate the educators?

The way to think about choosing a university might be clarified by reflecting more on the political career of Wilson, who in 1912 was elected president of the United States, just two years after leaving Princeton (and having served as governor of New Jersey in between). Based on his scholarship of applying scientific principles to politics, Wilson enacted a revolution in political practice known as Progressivism, which is rooted in a rejection of the principles of the Declaration of Independence and promotion of rule by bureaucratic experts.

Wilson succeeded all too well. The problem of life in the modern world is our deference to experts: Experts on the Mideast who led us into futile wars; experts on poverty who increased it; experts on race who stoked and aggravated racism; experts on immigration who weakened the bonds of citizenship; the list goes on. One man was unfazed by the experts and defied their minion strategists and was elected president, largely (or should I say, “bigly”) through relating directly to the people. He bypassed the experts.

This is flabbergasting: Can Donald Trump of Trump University notoriety really teach us about choosing the right school? The example is indeed instructive, though not in the way his critics wish. If false advertising is a cause for legal action, America’s “respectable” colleges and universities are the most under-litigated class in the country.

After all, how many colleges advertise or even admit in their catalogs to suicides, drug and alcohol abuse, post-graduation debt, “gut” courses that make no serious demands, or give an honest accounting of the professional accomplishments of their graduates? Far more widespread are slick packaging of slim pickings and meager accomplishments. If I may flash my own badge of expertise, I served for several months in higher education assessment for the State of Virginia, when I rejected some preposterous programs trying to pass as universities. Higher authority overruled my objections, and the pseudo-schools allowed to offer courses for college credit. Trump U is more the rule than an exception in American higher education, and may even have been more honest.

President Trump has forced practitioners and students of politics to reassess what their crafts entail. The conventional thinking defers to fake experts and fake science, all promoted by fake news (every one of them educated at our leading universities). But in 2016 voters turned away from their parties’ establishments, chose an outsider, and demanded a different way. While winning college-educated white voters, he also brought into his victorious coalition a large increase of those with only high-school educations. Their voices, no less capable than those with “higher” education of discerning what does and does not serve their own interests, deserved recognition too.

Just as we must question who will educate the educators, so we must ask of political life, who will judge the experts? Socrates once framed the question in this way: when we want a shoe, we go to a shoemaker, a ship, a shipbuilder, so why go to the people when we want a statesman? Trump provides that answer: Because you cannot trust the state. We must recognize the obligation to the people that government should operate only by and with their consent. There must be free and meaningful elections to take account of the opinions of ordinary citizens on matters that affect their lives— on questions of war, taxes, and basic government services.

The great political revolution of 2016 needs to be applied to the similar forms of corruption that beset our system of higher education. 

The establishments of both political parties and the Washington insiders only pay lip service to this elementary democratic principle. They preferred to allow the growth of an administrative state that replaced consent and elections with a bureaucracy of “expertise” as its great principle. In opposition, Trump promised and is returning American politics to the first principle upon which it is supposed to be based: consent of the governed.

The great political revolution of 2016 needs to be applied to the similar forms of corruption that beset our system of higher education. What is most striking there is the growth of college expenses and of the bureaucracies that consume the parents’ and governments’ finances. The turn to less costly means of education in online learning only skirts the real question: What is the purpose of all these deans and programs? While students don’t elect professors or administrators, they can choose this or that college or, increasingly, none at all.

Let’s focus on the key personnel in the great business of higher education: the teacher. Doesn’t being a professor imply some mastery of or at least acquaintance with a body of learning? Perhaps of some fundamental core disciplines or ideas or established great books? In evaluating how the professor changes the student, shouldn’t we see whether the graduate lives in a manner befitting a free man or woman, displaying all the traits of a liberally educated human being, as a citizen, a worker, a parent?

Trump is freeing us from conventional assumptions about Washington, D.C. The key questions the education establishment has wanted the rest of us to surrender to their expertise must be posed by students, parents, faculty, administrators, trustees, and mere taxpayers. The deference to expertise—or, more precisely, deference to mere claims of expertise—defies the chief political implication of human equality: officials, whether in government or institutions of higher learning, must observe the principle of rule by consent. With that realization we only need the courage to question the self-anointed experts.

 

About the Author:

Ken Masugi
Ken Masugi, PhD, has been a speechwriter for two Cabinet members and for Clarence Thomas, when he was Chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. He is co-author, editor, or co-editor of seven books on American politics. He has taught at the U.S. Air Force Academy, where he was Olin Distinguished Visiting Professor; James Madison College of Michigan State University; the Ashbrook Center of Ashland University; and Princeton University.
  • Party of Lincoln

    Candidate Trump asked that his sycophants believe that “Obama founded ISIS”. When Hugh Hewitt attempted to clarify that what Trump really meant was that Obama’s disastrous foreign policy led to the rise of ISIS, Trump stood his ground: “No, I meant he’s the founder of ISIS.”

    Candidate Trump asserted the inherent absurdity of American with a Hispanic-sounding name (born in Indiana), Gonzalo Curiel, of being morally fit to judge him in a court of law.

    Trump’s conception of the summum bonum of “higher education” was Trump University, which defrauded its students of tens of millions of dollars. This fraud was not a good idea gone bad, but the very purpose of Trump University. We do not built great colleges and universities to defraud students, but to provide them an education and form the character of our next generation of leaders, scholars and productive participants in our polity.

    President Trump has nothing to teach us of the great things concerning higher education. Let Trump be Trump, fine, but don’t reinvent him into something he isn’t and is arguably the very antithesis of what he actually is.

    • Nuther G. Mule

      “…We do not built great colleges and universities to defraud students, but to provide them an education and form the character of our next generation of leaders, scholars and productive participants in our polity….”

      Really? $50-60K per year to “learn” about social justice and the right pronouns to use and to be indoctrinated to the progressive ideal by ex-hippies and self-proclaimed communists with degrees in gender studies or race-specific sociology yapping about “white privilege” and “safe spaces” fueled by a government take-over of the loan market and a false premise that “everyone has the right to a college education? A massive debt-funded gravy train bloated with useless curricula that ignores the needs of the market to pursue the ideals of the “professor”?

      Sounds like defrauding to me. Sounds a LOT like it.

    • MidCali42

      Any college which offers the following majors is clearly fleecing its students. Why? Because these fields of study are unimportant, require little to no expertise, and are utterly useless in the economy. These would include:
      – Black Studies
      – Women’s Stidues
      – Chicano Studies
      – Art History
      – Journalism
      – Anthropology
      – Theater
      – Education
      – Dance

      None of these require any kind of academic rigor or discipline. They do not prepare one for any kind of real world work. Lastly, these wastes of time create absolutely zero marketable skills or value.

      Add to these wastes of time the fact most colleges have recently larded up with more admin than teaching and classroom support, and one can plainly see the rot. Colleges should be held to the same standards the Obama admin forced onto health insurance companies. 85% of their income must go directly to classrooms, or they face being cut off from all Pell grants and government backed stipends and loans.

  • Adobe_Walls

    The problem with our experts is they lack expertise.
    The number of professionals that aren’t teachers at our universities has grown exponentially in the last few decades and at current growth rates will soon outnumber teachers.

    • MaggieMSwain

      Google gives you extra profit source.1:Join,2:Work Only Few Hours a day,3:Weekly ontime payouts
      last week I bought a great Subaru Impreza since I been bringin in $9794 recently and-also, 10k this past month . this is definitely the most rewarding I have ever done . I started this 10-months ago and pretty much straight away was bringing in over $71, per-hr . check my source
      !ya32d:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GetParttimeProjectJobsAtGoogleMania/more/cash ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!ya32p..,.

  • gabriel martin

    The problem with our experts is they lack expertise.The number of professionals that aren’t teachers at our universities has grown exponentially in the last few decades and at current growth rates will soon outnumber teachers.

    • HelenHPuckett

      Google pays now $99 to each worker for working on computer.You can also avail this.
      on sunday I got a great new Ford Mustang from having made $9388 this – 5 weeks past . it’s certainly my favourite-job Ive ever done . I actually started 6 months ago and almost immediately started bringin in more than $99 per-hour . look at here
      !ar55d:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleHomeJobsNewKingJobs/simple/work ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!ar55l..,…

  • Stick

    I can recommend MIT’s Online Open Courseware. Check it out.

  • Itche-Meir

    Trump U
    Tells it all