The Folly of Military Intervention Without Public Support

Whether he entirely meant them to be or not, the essential tenets of Donald Trump’s successful run for the presidency were the winning issues of securing our border, restricting immigration, promoting fair trade, and limited foreign intervention. They have become known among a certain class of core supporters as ‘Trumpism.’ Those of us who were inspired by Trumpism worked worked so passionately for Trump’s election not because we were necessarily fans of the man himself, but rather because he represented the best chance of implementing what we believe are the key measures necessary to save our nation from ruin.

We are now four months in and, depending on one’s perspective, Trump is  either keeping his campaign promises (or, at least, is working towards them in a positive manner), or he’s betrayed his base entirely and is now a tool of the globalists.

Conservative pundit Ann Coulter, a long-time Trump supporter who wrote the book “In Trump We Trust,” is gradually moving toward the latter camp. In a recent interview with The Daily Caller, Coulter says she is still hopeful, but “things don’t look good” at this point. “I got to tell you when I wrote ‘Adios America,’ I thought there was a ten percent chance of saving the country,” Coulter said. “On the evening of November 8, I thought, ‘Wow, we have a 90 percent chance now. This is a chance that comes along once every thousand years. We can save America now.'”

Coulter is now noncommittally “someplace between ten percent and 90 percent” on whether or not we can save the country.

Perspective is a funny thing. Especially if you supported Trump from the beginning, it’s easy to close your eyes and imagine what life would be like now with Hillary Clinton as president, then watch all your criticisms of Trump miraculously melt away―at least for the moment. But we also must remember that the iron will likely never be as hot as it is now to move on the issues that won Trump the presidency.

But lately, what with Trump’s Syria missile strike, the MOAB drop on an ISIS tunnel system in Afghanistan and even General Mattis’s plan to send several thousand more troops to that failed nation, the issue of foreign intervention has again risen to the forefront. Trump’s strongest supporters seem nervous and ask:  What happened to non-interventionist Trump? Is Kushner pulling the strings now? Have the ‘globalists’ finally blackmailed him? Or is it possible that Trump is playing chess while his enemies play checkers, nibbling at the edges of war without actually taking the poisonous bite? Is he just doing what is necessary to engender fear and respect for the United States again around the globe?

align=”right” Bush never made a compelling case for the war in Iraq. Trump should remember that if he feels compelled to engage abroad. It turned out that the sense of the American people on this mattered more than that of Bush and his experts. It is unlikely to be different for Trump.

Of all the things Obama got wrong, he did at least read the mood of the American people right by generally staying out of direct foreign military engagements.

Americans who remember history, and granted there are precious few of them these days, are not wrong to be nervous. It was barely a decade ago that George W. Bush lost both Houses of Congress essentially because he got America involved in a war that lost its meaning and one for which her people lost patience for waging.

What have we accomplished after over a trillion dollars and 4,500 American lives? Is Iraq truly better off than she was when Saddam Hussein held power? Is America better off without her blood and treasure and with exponentially more enemies abroad?

Bush never made a compelling case for the war in Iraq. Trump should remember that if he feels compelled to engage abroad. It turned out that the sense of the American people on this mattered more than that of Bush and his experts. It is unlikely to be different for Trump.

Of all the things Obama got wrong, he did at least read the mood of the American people right by generally staying out of direct foreign military engagements. The exceptions, like “regime change” in Libya, turned out to be disastrous not only for the Americans who lost their lives for nothing, but also for those countries and the surrounding nations, particularly Europe, now overwhelmed by the refugee crisis created at least in part by our meddling.

And with neocons like Lindsey Graham and John McCain, who always seem bloodthirsty for another military intervention somewhere (anywhere!), tickling Trump’s ears with praise every time he lets slip the dogs of war, are there enough people around Trump to remind him that these things never end well?

What exactly is our vital national security interest in Syria? Is it simply to see Russia foiled? And if so, why? Is it to stop the refugee crisis? Because if so, toppling Bashar al-Assad certainly will NOT accomplish this and, since chaos always erupts in a power vacuum, may in fact accomplish quite the opposite. And in Muslim countries, as has been proven time and time again, the forces that fill that vacuum are always far worse than what we destroyed to create it. Would even the most strident neocon argue that Saddam Hussein or Muammar Gaddafi was worse than ISIS is now?

Which brings us to American troop levels in Afghanistan and the rumor that 3,000 to 5,000 more could be added to their number. While certainly nowhere near what they were a decade ago when upwards of 100,000 U.S. troops combed the deserts, the increase stokes the fear of those worried about a repeat engagement. Osama bin Laden is dead, so why are we still in Afghanistan? What vital American interest lies there? Have not the Afghan warlords grown rich enough from American largesse? Trump needs to explain.

It would be one thing if we were “taking the oil” or other resources from these places, as candidate-Trump said time and time again. But instead, we’re presumably trying to create ex nihilo the stability that is the basis of civilization. But that can only come from within.

In a recent Tucker Carlson Tonight appearance, Blackwater founder Eric Prince had an entirely different approach to America’s seemingly endless war, an “East India Company model.”

So, we’re spending as, as a country, $42 billion there this year. There’s 8,000 troops, three quarters of them never actually leave the base. If you look back in history, the way the English operated in India for 250 years, they had an army that was largely run by companies, and no English soldiers. So, very cheap, very low cost, very simple, very adaptable … We’ve fought for the last fifteen years with the First Infantry Division model, now we should fight with an East India Company model and do it much cheaper. There’s a trillion dollars of value in the ground…mining…minerals. And another trillion of oil and gas, and that’s the U.S. Geological Survey estimates, but yet, you don’t have a mining law and Afghanistan.

If the American people insist on having some presence overseas, perhaps this would be the way to go about it. Because like it or not and as much as President Trump is trying to change it, America is going broke and can no longer afford unprofitable overseas adventures. Let’s make it profitable, or let’s get the hell out


About Scott Morefield

Scott Morefield is a news and opinion columnist for BizPac Review and the editor of Raising Godly Children. In addition to his work on BPR, Scott's commentary can also be found on Breitbart, TheBlaze, and many other sites, including A Morefield Life, where he and his wife, Kim, share their marriage and parenting journey.

Want news updates?

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

7 responses to “The Folly of Military Intervention Without Public Support

  • WTF…Haven’t we learned ANYTHING watching the unending catastrophe of never-ending unsuccessful war unfold for the past 70 years? In that time, haven’t we all seen the destruction of our liberty and freedom continue unabated under the depradations of the Welfare-Warfare State that our former and now lost Republic has become? There is NO PROFIT in all this, except for the few crony capitalists that rake in trillions in government spending, even as they beggar the entire nation in the process. There is no other option for any SANE person but to just GET THE HELL OUT!

  • Failing to prepare usually means preparing to fail.

    Candidate Trump, in spite of a few stumbles, achieved a brilliant campaign; largely by ignoring all the conventional wisdom (= rubbish from the political adviser class, data-driven wonks, Establishment mantras and nostrums and rhetoric) and telling it like it is.

    He was so brave and good at that, that I supposed he would be – if not another Elizabeth I of England turning the entire bad national situation round on a dime – at least pretty competent at getting quite a sizeable result on behalf of his 4 main themes, which Mr Morefield here rightly characterizes as ‘securing our border, restricting immigration, promoting fair trade, and limited foreign intervention’.

    Now I am far from sure; and I fear that the reason for this is that while he was going to hell and back several times each quarter during the gruelling election campaign – and ending up, against mountainous odds, victorious (hurrah!!) – Candidate Trump did not have a team of utterly loyal individuals shut away in a closed mansion somewhere with no communication to the general world outside, preparing all the very many strategic steps needed to pull off an Elizabeth-I-type turnaround; e.g.

    Sacking of all Obama holdovers

    Full preparation of a demand for special counsels and prosecutors to look into the corruption of the DOJ, the IRS, the Dept of State, the FBI, during Obama’s terms of office

    Demand for a special prosecutor to ‘clear up’ the ambiguities created by James Comey’s strategies and statements during the previous year anent the Clinton investigation

    Demand for an audit of the Clinton Foundation.

    If in his first days as president all these things had been put in place, would not the Left and the Mainstream Media and the Democratic Party and the Establishment, Republican no less than Democrat, have been put on their back feet and given an awful lot to chew over, endure, and explain away; rather than THEIR now having the time of their lives turning the President into their own coconut shy, and at the same time talking him into sell-out positions on policy?

  • If Trump takes America to war, it should be in a grand coalition with Muslim states and Russia and the goal should be the rapid and total elimination of ISIS and its replacement with anything that will maintain peace in practice including support for Assad if needs be. The war should of course be approved by Congress. The goal should be killing the enemy.

    As MEP Janusz Korwin Mikke says: let’s recognize ISIS, declare war and kill them all.

    The principle barrier to this is the stupid and suicidal American media and the neoconservatives who hate Russia more than they love America.

    Western Europeans voting in droves to kill themselves likewise doesn’t help.

    Trump has a very hard job ahead of him. Putin is lightyears ahead – still. But godspeed Mr. President!

  • I don’t think using armament is “foreign entanglement.” Especially when you do strike while Chinese president at dinner with you. That’s a message – to China, in Aghanistan, MOAB, also.

    I don’t know what 5000 troops are. Not enough for nation building. Necessary to keep al Qaeda from re-forming? With better rules of engagement, enough to wipe all Taliban out?

    Re giving up on Trump now: 1) he over promised during campaign – he promised deliverables which not in his control. Surely this author and Coulter realized that. If not, that is on them; 2) He has delivered a massive amount already – things which are in his control, e.g., killed TPP, SCOTUS justice, pipelines, deporting felon illegals. His presidency already worth it. 3) For god’s sake, it’s only been 4 months. Are you crazy? There are only 24 hours in a day, and his 24 hours are mostly taken up by hostile Congress, media, federal bureaucracy and federal judiciary. Did you expect him to achieve everything in 4 months? If so, that’s nuts. I’m a fan of Coulter, but I think right now she is indeed nuts. 4) No one is perfect and Trump won’t be either. Nobody held any other candidate or president to any standard and they drluvered nothing. This guy is delivering a lot – and it’s him you’re going to hold to perfection? That’s totally whacko.

    • Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj227:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash227HomeSoftwareGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj227..,…

  • Trump isn’t operating in a vacuum. The globalist opposition includes the dems, the GOPe, the administrative state, and the media poodles. Coulter is aware of this and I can’t understand why she wouldn’t cut Trump some slack for it. Trump is trying to do things he can to fulfill his promises. He’s is going up against a heavy headwind. As a former military man, I don’t care for writers to talk about wasted lives. It tells me they really don’t understand it at all. President Bush’s problem was this: The American people demanded he do something. The Congress were cowards and went along with it. President Bush’s plan was the right one, but the dems and their media poodles undercut him at every turn. Since Bush himself was a globalist, he never called the dems out, even after pelosi and reid committed treason. Bush sold us out to the globalists.
    I prefer to keep my hopes up. If Trump doesn’t prevail, it’s over for America.

  • We are we are contributing to the erosion of the Constitution when we fund offensive military actions overseas without an actual declaration of war.

Comments are closed.