Draining the Academic Swamp

Civil rights historian Abigail Thernstrom once spoke of the American campus as “an island of repression in a sea of freedom.” That was in 1989. At the high tide of freedom we who believed in unfettered inquiry and free speech believed these islands might “stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it,” as Jefferson proposed to leave the enemies of freedom in his day. We were wrong.

Reason is not left free to combat unreasonable arguments when reasonable arguments are squelched by force. Reason is not left free when teachers and students are not free to hear and assess the reasons of all sides for themselves. In happier times groups like the National Association of Scholars, and the American Council of Trustees and Alumni thought that Universities could be saved for freedom by insiders. But each cohort of insiders has proved to be either more impotent in the face of the challenge or more hostile to freedom than those who came before.

align=”right” American universities can repress because a free society thoughtlessly subsidizes repression.

Freedom isn’t free, as the cliché goes. But fortunately for the partisans of freedom, totalitarian thuggery isn’t free either, and can can only survive when it can take or steal the resources it needs to pay for its seitan and arugula.

American universities can repress because a free society thoughtlessly subsidizes repression. But most Americans, one has no choice but to hope, are still partisans of freedom, and the democratic process has put the enemies of freedom into the power of its friends. Those friends must, for once, recognize that the boldest measures are the safest. I have a bold measure to propose—but first we must consider whether it is bold enough.

The commanding heights of American higher education lie in the accreditation process. To bring in tuition money through government tuition grants and subsidized student loans a school must be accredited. To bring in foreign students, highly desirable because they generally pay full tuition, a school must likewise be accredited.

Who guards the guards? Schools are accredited by accreditation agencies, but by Federal law accreditation agencies must be certified by the Secretary of Education. All Betsy DeVos has to do is require that these agencies ensure that their students and teachers are protected in their ability to study, discuss, and learn.  How, in turn, can agencies, carry out this function?

Fortunately the agencies can learn from best practice. The University of Chicago, which has received the highest rating in the United States for protecting and encouraging intellectual diversity has set out its principles in a brief report where the University promises “to promote a lively and fearless freedom of debate and deliberation, but also to protect that freedom when others attempt to restrict it.”

DeVos must simply demand that all accrediting agencies take the “Chicago principles” for their guidelines. The agencies must, in turn, require that all secular schools under their purview endorse these principles, and withdraw the accreditation of those that do not endorse them or fail to protect freedom against thuggery. Pomona, say, may prefer to remain under the knout of its student “Red Guards” as enabled by faculty and administrators—but Pomona has a $2 billion endowment to waste in much the same fashion as the thug state of Venezuela has wasted its oil wealth. A free people will look on from without in pity and horror.

To impose freedom from without requires allies from within: accreditation requires accreditors, academic peers, to visit campuses and make reports. If we act now there are still genuine liberals (of all parties) scattered throughout the cities of the plain, including scholars of national reputation such as Camille Paglia, Laura Kipnis, and Cornel West. It may take legislation or even the creation of a new civil rights commission for higher education, but enough of these men and women are prepared to testify before Congress or to serve.

American higher education can still be saved for freedom, but only if all who love alma mater as she was and could be will cut her off from the moneys that have financed her totalitarian binge.


About Michael S. Kochin

Michael S. Kochin is Professor Extraordinarius in the School of Political Science, Government, and International Relations at Tel Aviv University. He received his A.B. in mathematics from Harvard and his M.A. and Ph.D. in political science from the University of Chicago. He has held visiting appointments at Yale, Princeton, Toronto, Claremont McKenna College, and the Catholic University of America. He has written widely on the comparative analysis of institutions, political thought, politics and literature, and political rhetoric. With the historian Michael Taylor he has written An Independent Empire: Diplomacy & War in the Making of the United States (University of Michigan Press, 2020).

Support Free & Independent Journalism Your support helps protect our independence so that American Greatness can keep delivering top-quality, independent journalism that's free to everyone. Every contribution, however big or small, helps secure our future. If you can, please consider a recurring monthly donation.

Want news updates?

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

8 responses to “Draining the Academic Swamp”

  1. EXCELLENT idea. I do hope the Trump Administration sees this.

  2. I do not believe that the solution to the conquest of the universities by the anti-intellectual Left is to ask the State to “impose freedom from without.” That kind of imposition, in the form of the Ed. Dept.’s OCR “Dear Colleague” letter, is precisely the damage we need DeVos to undo. And even if you succeed in getting universities to formally adopt a plank in their pedagogic platform, you have not really succeeded in doing anything. The history of unequivocal language in charter documents in this country (“shall not be infringed,” “shall make no law”) proves that it can be practically ignored for as long as the State can litigate discrete, particular “cases and controversies,” which is forever, especially when the State agency–in this case, the university (public or private)–has coffers overflowing from the swollen federal river of money.

    So the best way–and the only way–to weed out the ruling “hate speech” faction is to starve them out. Cut off all federal financial support of any kind for college except to STEM majors who maintain a high GPA, and the academic departments and administrative offices hosting the hate speech crowd will wither and die of their own accord. I assure you that neither Pomona nor Harvard nor any other college or university will spend down its endowment to keep the hate speech faculty and assistant provosts for inclusion employed, nor to pay for all of the kids necessary to keep their classrooms full.

    • I recognize your concerns, however, the ‘climate change’ crowd has proven that not even STEM is immune from leftist indoctrination. A ‘Dear Colleague’ letter followed by *actual* removal of accreditation for any higher education institution failing in any significant way to conform to the requirements of genuine academic freedom seems to me a good way to go.

  3. I had wondered what levers might be available to pry leftist extremism out of academia. This is one answer.

  4. Fantastic idea! The threat of the loss of accreditation should be a powerful fulcrum. But not the only one. In tandem with withdrawal of funding and federal education programs, we may finally in a generation or less return to a truly liberal education as we used to know it.

  5. No.
    The author and his kind counsel moderation as always, their counsel stayed our hands to our ruin.
    Gramschi’s Long March won the traitors their castles.
    Let them defend them.
    Burn them all.
    Those institutions cannot be saved nor do they merit salvage.
    The Left marched through those institutions and the Left owns them, let the Left defend them.
    These dens of vice and predation plague us with corrupt, jaded children and bankrupt us for the privilege.
    What is done with plague infected corpses?
    Burn them all.
    Raze these dens of vice and predation, idiocy to the ground.
    Every time one is razed it’s students owe nothing-debt nullified.
    Every time the PS’s raze the property taxes become zero.
    Free our children, our future and free from debt and taxes of this most degenerate of priestly cults.

    • I think we need a couple Kent State 1970 style altercations.